Yes, and thanks for the help, It seems to work to compile the source from the tarball
the ordinary way also.
Progress-report on the es18xx.c on ES1878:
* I found the nd_es18xx_dsp_get_byte() to be inconsistent with the spec. and rewrote
it accordingly.
static int snd_es18xx_dsp_get_byte(es18xx
I'm running alsa-0.9rc7 just fine on a slightly modified Debian 3.0r1
(I've upgraded a few packages to versions in sarge or sid) with kernel
2.4.20.
I did not use the regular alsa tarball, but rather the
alsa-source_0.9.0rc7-1_all.deb available in sid. I made it with
make-kpkg --revision splee
A simple question, does the current Alsa release tarball work out of the box ?as is?,
i.e. ./configure ;make install on Debian current release, compiled kernel 2.4.20.
I am doing some work on the es18xx.c and don?t want to hit my head in the wall if
there are any problems with respect to the pac