On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:44, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
[snip]
> ALSA tree was fully synced with kernel yesterday. Not all changes are in
> 2.5.40. Please, wait for 2.5.41 or get the kernel sources from BitKeeper
> repository of 2.5.
>
> Jaroslav
Takas
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:44, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > ALSA tree was fully synced with kernel yesterday. Not all changes are in
> > 2.5.40. Please, wait for 2.5.41 or get the kernel sources from BitKeeper
> > repository of 2.5.
> >
> >
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:44, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
[snip]
>
> ALSA tree was fully synced with kernel yesterday. Not all changes are in
> 2.5.40. Please, wait for 2.5.41 or get the kernel sources from BitKeeper
> repository of 2.5.
>
> Jaroslav
>
J
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:44, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was wondering when we can expect an update to ALSA in the kernel source
> > - we're still on -rc2, aren't we? Now that 2.5.x is getting a little
> > more useable, I'd like to st
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering when we can expect an update to ALSA in the kernel source -
> we're still on -rc2, aren't we? Now that 2.5.x is getting a little more
> useable, I'd like to start running it again (I stopped at 2.5.25 as it really
> did b
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 11:17, I wrote:
[SNIP]
> I'm currently compiling 2.5.40 with _no sound_. However, for some reason,
> make modules_install comes back with:
Uh, not quite true -- the config bug fooled me. I'd actually config'd ALSA in
with oss-emulation.
-- Peter
---
Hi all,
I was wondering when we can expect an update to ALSA in the kernel source -
we're still on -rc2, aren't we? Now that 2.5.x is getting a little more
useable, I'd like to start running it again (I stopped at 2.5.25 as it really
did become too dangerous). But I want ALSA :-)
I'm curren
