Re: [Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-21 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Wed, 19 Mar 2003 22:35:17 +0900, Jon Ellis wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 09:08 PM, Justin Cormack wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:49, Jon Ellis wrote: > >> On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 10:29 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >>> > >>> i guess it reached to 32bit int limit (401*

Re: [Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-19 Thread Jon Ellis
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 11:45 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: (B (B> At Wed, 19 Mar 2003 22:35:17 +0900, (B> Jon Ellis wrote: (B>> (B>> i'll give it a try... my suspicion is that it wont work because it's (B>> the number of... er, frames (? I'm not sure i'm using the correct (B>> names (

Re: [Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-19 Thread Jon Ellis
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 09:08 PM, Justin Cormack wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:49, Jon Ellis wrote: On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 10:29 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: i guess it reached to 32bit int limit (401*60*4*44100). so far, aplay/arecord doesn't support more than size_t max, which is

Re: [Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-19 Thread Justin Cormack
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 09:49, Jon Ellis wrote: > On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 10:29 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > i guess it reached to 32bit int limit (401*60*4*44100). > > so far, aplay/arecord doesn't support more than size_t max, which is > > 32bit on i386. > > Yep, that was my guess too.

Re: [Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-19 Thread Jon Ellis
On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 10:29 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: i guess it reached to 32bit int limit (401*60*4*44100). so far, aplay/arecord doesn't support more than size_t max, which is 32bit on i386. Yep, that was my guess too. Is this something anyone is interested in fixing? A couple of ideas

Re: [Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-19 Thread Jon Ellis
Thanks for the workaround. Cheers j. On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 11:43 PM, Kai Vehmanen wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Kai Vehmanen wrote: ecasound -f:16,2,44100 -i alsa -o stdout |oggenc -r -q 0 -o recording.ogg - Btw; ecasound can also launch oggenc by itself. To modify oggenc params, you

Re: [Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-18 Thread Kai Vehmanen
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > ecasound -f:16,2,44100 -i alsa -o stdout |oggenc -r -q 0 -o recording.ogg - Btw; ecasound can also launch oggenc by itself. To modify oggenc params, you have to edit ~/.ecasound/ecasoundrc (see man ecasoundrc(5) for info). So the above command would be:

Re: [Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-18 Thread Kai Vehmanen
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Jon Ellis wrote: >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12724 [...] >> and it's giving me grief because it takes so long to reproduce. The >> basic problem is that either arecord or oggenc hangs after 400min >> 47sec. The fact that lowering the sample rate (and talking t

Re: [Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-18 Thread Takashi Iwai
At Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:48:16 +0900, Jon Ellis wrote: > > Got bored waiting for a moderator... > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: Jon Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sat Mar 15, 2003 9:32:20 PM Japan > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: arecord bug? > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm the owner

[Alsa-devel] Fwd: arecord bug?

2003-03-18 Thread Jon Ellis
Got bored waiting for a moderator... Begin forwarded message: From: Jon Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat Mar 15, 2003 9:32:20 PM Japan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: arecord bug? Hi, I'm the owner of this bug in gentoo: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12724 and it's giving me grie