CTED]
> > To: Alsa-Devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:01:01 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] HDSP 9652: Input channel corruption
> >
> > ...
> > Then look at it in a waveform editor and zoom way in so you can see
>It sounds to me that the problem Nick Arnold is describing is that in
>single-speed (48kS/s) mode, channels 0, 8, and 16 have a 1-sample delay
>with respect to all the other channels (using 0-based indexing for
>channel numbers here). This is irrelevant when recording uncorrelated
>signals, and s
It sounds to me that the problem Nick Arnold is describing is that in
single-speed (48kS/s) mode, channels 0, 8, and 16 have a 1-sample delay
with respect to all the other channels (using 0-based indexing for
channel numbers here). This is irrelevant when recording uncorrelated
signals, and subtl
Nick,
Following on from my other response to you, I do not see the problem
you are speaking of. (Again, assuming I understand what you are saying
the problem is.) The attacked .png file (I hope small enough to be
accepted by the reflector - it's about 27K) shows the audio on channels
8, 10, 12 &
Hi,
OK, so let me make sure I'm understanding what you're doing. If I
have it right, then comments below might make soem sense. If I have it
wrong, then disregard everything below and help me get it straight.
My understanding now is that you are just running using standard 48K
operation, but
Hi and thanks for the reply,
> > We connect a sine wave to the first 12 channels and record them, and see
> > three channels -- 0, 4, and 8 -- are "corrupted". The remaining channels
> > appear to be well-formed and look as we expect them to.
>
> When you say the 'first 12 channels', are you spe
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 20:12, Nick Arnold wrote:
> The symptoms:
>
>
> We connect a sine wave to the first 12 channels and record them, and see
> three channels -- 0, 4, and 8 -- are "corrupted". The remaining channels
> appear to be well-formed and look as we expect them to.
When yo
Hello,
(I'm posting this again with smaller attachments since my first attempt was
over-sized and appears to be stuck in the moderator's in-tray. Many
appologies if both posts appear -- the content is otherwise identical.)
I've posted previously about problems getting the 9652 up-and-working. W
Hello,
(I'm trying a re-post of this question with smaller attachments since the
first message was over-sized and appears to have been blocked in the
moderator's in-tray. Many appologies if both posts appear -- the content is
identical.)
I've posted previously about problems getting the 9652 up-
