At Thu, 17 Jul 2003 07:37:31 -0500,
Art Haas wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:13 -0500,
> > Art Haas wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I have a large set of patches removing the obsolete GCC structure
> > > initializers and r
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:13 -0500,
> Art Haas wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > I have a large set of patches removing the obsolete GCC structure
> > initializers and replacing them with C99 initializers. The total patch
> > set is around
At Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:57:13 -0500,
Art Haas wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I have a large set of patches removing the obsolete GCC structure
> initializers and replacing them with C99 initializers. The total patch
> set is around 70K and affects 34 files. Would it be acceptable to post
> the patch in compre
Hi.
I have a large set of patches removing the obsolete GCC structure
initializers and replacing them with C99 initializers. The total patch
set is around 70K and affects 34 files. Would it be acceptable to post
the patch in compressed form to the list, or would posting the patches
in say two or t
