On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 09:32:50PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> >
> > Nice patch, but we turn in the maintaince nightmare, because our CVS tree
> > contains shared sources among all kernels. I'll give a look what I can do
> > to remove this code.
>
>
Congratulations!
At Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:11:32 +0100 (CET),
Jaroslav wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > Jaroslav, could you sync with 2.5 tree and submit the patches to
> > Linus (even before pnp-merge)? otherwise we'll have again a mega-giga
>
> I'm doing pnp changes in
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Jaroslav, could you sync with 2.5 tree and submit the patches to
> Linus (even before pnp-merge)? otherwise we'll have again a mega-giga
I'm doing pnp changes in separate bk tree.
> patchset :)
I'll try do what I can. (un)fortunately, a great life eve
At Sat, 18 Jan 2003 21:32:50 +0100 (CET),
Jaroslav wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Hi Jaroslav,
> >
> > the patch below removes #if'd code for kernel 2.2 (and in one place for
> > kernel < 2.4.18) from ALSA.
> >
> > I've tested the compilation with 2.5.59.
> >
> > Please
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi Jaroslav,
>
> the patch below removes #if'd code for kernel 2.2 (and in one place for
> kernel < 2.4.18) from ALSA.
>
> I've tested the compilation with 2.5.59.
>
> Please apply
Nice patch, but we turn in the maintaince nightmare, because our CVS tree
