James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
James Courtier-Dutton hat gesagt: // James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
You will be lucky to find any sound card complying with the USB Audio
spec, as the spec is written so badly.
This is the USB spec I'm referring, not the USB AUDIO spec.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
James Courtier-Dutton hat gesagt: // James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
You will be lucky to find any sound card complying with the USB Audio
spec, as the spec is written so badly.
This is the USB spec I'm referring, not the USB AUDIO spec. Those
M-Audio devices aren't e
Hallo,
James Courtier-Dutton hat gesagt: // James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> You will be lucky to find any sound card complying with the USB Audio
> spec, as the spec is written so badly.
This is the USB spec I'm referring, not the USB AUDIO spec. Those
M-Audio devices aren't even recognized as be
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
I'd like to propose changing the status of three M-Audio USB
devices in the soundcard matrix to "unsupported on 2.6". The Quattro,
Audiophile USB and reportedly the Duo all don't comply to the USB
specification, as has been discussed here and on linux-usb-dev in the
r
Hallo,
I'd like to propose changing the status of three M-Audio USB
devices in the soundcard matrix to "unsupported on 2.6". The Quattro,
Audiophile USB and reportedly the Duo all don't comply to the USB
specification, as has been discussed here and on linux-usb-dev in the
recent past.
Thus they
