On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Tommi Sakari Uimonen wrote:
> Yes it doesn't sound sexy at all. But I tested arecord to perform nicely
> with 96khz 24channels 32bit data, on a ext2 filesystem (I found ext2 to be
> the best filesystem for this kind of writing). As I'm going to record max
> 12 channels, this s
> >> I'm planning to use arecord for serious harddisk recording, but it can't
>
> that's a non-starter :) at the very least, you'd better make sure you
> always use a period size larger than the maximum scheduling delay you
> think you might encounter, since arecord writes to disk from the same
> t
>> I'm planning to use arecord for serious harddisk recording, but it can't
that's a non-starter :) at the very least, you'd better make sure you
always use a period size larger than the maximum scheduling delay you
think you might encounter, since arecord writes to disk from the same
thread as on
> You can almost certainly just add
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
> to the CFLAGS in the Makefile. (it would be good if this was default on
> 32bit platforms).
Thanks. This did the trick.
Tommi
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Tommi Sakari Uimonen wrote:
>> Ecasound has support for LFS (compile with --with-largefile).
> Is there also --with-96khz option? :)
> If there is, or there will be soon (in two days), I'll change to that.
No need for a separate option :) ...
ecasound -f:s32_le,2,96000 -i als
I guess the CVS doesn't update very rapidly. Since I last checked (5 mins
ago) aplay.c was dated Aug 7)
> Ecasound has support for LFS (compile with --with-largefile).
Is there also --with-96khz option? :)
If there is, or there will be soon (in two days), I'll change to that.
88200 would do fine
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Tommi Sakari Uimonen wrote:
> I'm planning to use arecord for serious harddisk recording, but it can't
I strongly suggest to look for other alternatives. For serious
harddisk recording you absolutely need an application that provides
protection against spikes in disk i/o oper
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Tommi Sakari Uimonen wrote:
> I'm planning to use arecord for serious harddisk recording, but it can't
> write files bigger than 2BG. After browsing through kernel mailing lists
> about LFS I concluded that the problem is arecord, not the underlying
> filesystem (and since I'v
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 09:15, Tommi Sakari Uimonen wrote:
> I'm planning to use arecord for serious harddisk recording, but it can't
> write files bigger than 2BG. After browsing through kernel mailing lists
> about LFS I concluded that the problem is arecord, not the underlying
> filesystem (and si
I'm planning to use arecord for serious harddisk recording, but it can't
write files bigger than 2BG. After browsing through kernel mailing lists
about LFS I concluded that the problem is arecord, not the underlying
filesystem (and since I've had >8GB files on it :).
I looked at the code, but didn
10 matches
Mail list logo
