Hi Guilhem,
At Tue, 10 Sep 2002 08:29:59 -0700 (PDT),
Guilhem Tardy wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I modified my previous patch for supporting a period_size (rather than
> period_bytes) constraint with Takashi's suggestion that the fields be non-zero
> for either constraint to kick in. See file in atta
At Tue, 10 Sep 2002 10:06:31 -0700 (PDT),
Guilhem Tardy wrote:
>
> > just add the constraint in open callback, such like
> >
> > int your_pcm_open(snd_pcm_substream_t *substream)
> > {
> > ...
> >
> > err = snd_pcm_hw_constraint_minmax(runtime, SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_PERIOD_SIZE,
> >
> > I modified my previous patch for supporting a period_size (rather than
> > period_bytes) constraint with Takashi's suggestion that the fields be
> > non-zero for either constraint to kick in. See file in attachment.
> > It has worked fine on my hardware for the past few days.
>
> you don't ne
Hi all,
I modified my previous patch for supporting a period_size (rather than
period_bytes) constraint with Takashi's suggestion that the fields be non-zero
for either constraint to kick in. See file in attachment. It has worked fine on
my hardware for the past few days.
Guilhem.
