> The first part looks good (I've put it to CVS), but the second part can
> cause trouble when the PCM is not initialized (resolution is zero). I
> think, if the timer is slave (we can't predict the tick time), then it's
> better to stay with some reasonable defaults.
So have you committed a fixe
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> Of course I forgot the patch.
>
> It's now attached.
The first part looks good (I've put it to CVS), but the second part can
cause trouble when the PCM is not initialized (resolution is zero). I
think, if the timer is slave (we can't predict the tick ti
Of course I forgot the patch.
It's now attached.
jack.
diff -u -r1.53 seq_timer.c
--- seq/seq_timer.c 2001/06/06 17:46:51 1.53
+++ seq/seq_timer.c 2001/09/16 22:52:54
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
if (!tmr->running)
return;
- resolution = tmr->period;
+
