Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-27 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for the late response. > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > I've added the snd_pcm_forward() function. This function is > > function with opposite meaning to snd_pcm_rewind() - it skips given count > > of frames (note

Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-27 Thread Kai Vehmanen
Hi, sorry for the late response. On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > I've added the snd_pcm_forward() function. This function is > function with opposite meaning to snd_pcm_rewind() - it skips given count > of frames (note that in the ring buffer are unchanged, only the r/w > poi

Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-24 Thread Abramo Bagnara
Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > > > I think that I have one present problem. It was not possible to write, > > > something like the dmix plugin does (in the server/client model): Transfer > > > data to different areas in t

Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-24 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > I think that I have one present problem. It was not possible to write, > > something like the dmix plugin does (in the server/client model): Transfer > > data to different areas in the ring buffer. Imagine that client1 wa

Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-23 Thread Abramo Bagnara
Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > I think that I have one present problem. It was not possible to write, > something like the dmix plugin does (in the server/client model): Transfer > data to different areas in the ring buffer. Imagine that client1 wants to > write data at the end of the ring buffer (ass

Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-23 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > > > > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I'd like to announce a new PCM API extension. Although it is > > > > implemented, it might be

Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-23 Thread Paul Davis
>> where the buffer is auto-silenced that they need to write samples into the >> specific position. Reset is nice, but you cannot tell the count of frames >> to be skipped without filling. > >However I think that auto-silence is not the best thing we've designed. > >We're using an interrupt handler

Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-23 Thread Abramo Bagnara
Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I'd like to announce a new PCM API extension. Although it is > > > implemented, it might be changed following the discussion on this list. > > > I'

Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-23 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I'd like to announce a new PCM API extension. Although it is > > implemented, it might be changed following the discussion on this list. > > I've added the snd_pcm_forward() function. T

Re: [Alsa-devel] New PCM API extension

2003-02-22 Thread Abramo Bagnara
Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'd like to announce a new PCM API extension. Although it is > implemented, it might be changed following the discussion on this list. > I've added the snd_pcm_forward() function. This function is > function with opposite meaning to snd_pc