On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 20:20:40 +0100
Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Martes, 28 de Octubre de 2003 17:30, Ryan Pavlik escribió:
> > Clemens Ladisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The event timestamps are set yo the current time of the queue. Your
> > > queue isn't running, s
El Martes, 28 de Octubre de 2003 17:30, Ryan Pavlik escribió:
> Clemens Ladisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The event timestamps are set yo the current time of the queue. Your
> > queue isn't running, so its current time is zero.
> >
> > Call snd_seq_start_queue(seq, queue, NULL) (and snd_seq_dr
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:23:40 +0100 (MET)
Clemens Ladisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> > Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> > > > Shouldn't I get numbers in ev->time.time.tv_*? I'm just getting
> > > > zeros... what did I miss? ;)
> > >
> >
Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> > > Shouldn't I get numbers in ev->time.time.tv_*? I'm just getting
> > > zeros... what did I miss? ;)
> >
> > (snip)
>
> OK, I've attached some code to show what I'm doing exactly.
The event timestamps are se
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:54:21 +0100
Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Sat, 25 Oct 2003 02:41:06 -0700,
> Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> > Shouldn't I get numbers in ev->time.time.tv_*? I'm just getting
> > zeros... what did I miss? ;)
>
> no, it should be, as long as the event is delivered to t
Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> but when I subscribe to a port, and I've done this:
> :
> snd_seq_port_subscribe_set_queue(subs, 1);
> snd_seq_port_subscribe_set_time_update(subs, 1);
> snd_seq_port_subscribe_set_time_real(subs, 1);
> :
> Shouldn't I get numbers in ev->time.time.tv
At Sat, 25 Oct 2003 02:41:06 -0700,
Ryan Pavlik wrote:
>
> Minor question... I probably just overlooked something...
> but when I subscribe to a port, and I've done this:
>
> :
> snd_seq_port_subscribe_set_queue(subs, 1);
> snd_seq_port_subscribe_set_time_update(subs, 1);
> sn
