[Alsa-devel] sending timestamped to scheduling queue

2001-11-09 Thread Ricardo Colon
I'm trying to figure out how to send a timestamped event(for ex. a SND_SEQ_EVENT_NOTE message) to the scheduling queue. There is a function to send queue control messagess, but how do I enqueue an timestamped event. The documentation says: "For scheduling an event on the specified queue, a clie

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [linux-audio-user] Soundcard supporting severalaudio streams

2001-11-09 Thread Patrick Shirkey
Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > Paul Davis wrote: > > > > >To be more specific I'm referring to a function(?) called type share as > > >opposed to type hw. PD mentioned last week that Abramo had implemented > > >it a while ago and mentioned that it did this for cards that do not have > > >support for m

Re: [Alsa-devel] sending timestamped to scheduling queue

2001-11-09 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Ricardo Colon wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out how to send a timestamped event(for ex. a > SND_SEQ_EVENT_NOTE message) to the scheduling queue. There is a function > to send queue control messagess, but how do I enqueue an timestamped > event. > > The documentation says: >

Re: [Alsa-devel] sending timestamped to scheduling queue

2001-11-09 Thread Ricardo Colon
Ok. I now understand what the doc says. After I fill the queue field(in an event) with the proper queue number, how do I actually enqueue a timestamped event to the designated queue? Thanks. -- R: On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > On Fri, 9 Nov 200

Re: [Alsa-devel] sending timestamped to scheduling queue

2001-11-09 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Ricardo Colon wrote: > Ok. I now understand what the doc says. > > After I fill the queue field(in an event) with the proper queue number, > how do I actually enqueue a timestamped event to the designated queue? Use the standard snd_seq_event_output* functions.

Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: minimum tick time

2001-11-09 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On 8 Nov 2001, Josh Green wrote: > On Thu, 2001-11-08 at 01:52, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Maarten de Boer wrote: > > > > > Paul Davis wrote: > > > > Ah, OK. yes, i suppose this might not be clear. > > > > [...] > > > > > > But you made it completely clear now! Thank you very

Re: [Alsa-devel] PATCH: Fixing compilation of 0.5.12 & gcc-2.96[3/4]

2001-11-09 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On 8 Nov 2001, Juan Quintela wrote: > > > Hi > > This patch changes: > > #include > > by > > #include > > includding malloc.h produces warnings in 2.4. Notice that 2.2 also > has slab.h with the same meaning/functionality that 2.4 (In both > malloc.h is just a #include > > If you have any ques

Re: [Alsa-devel] PATCH: Fixing compilation of 0.5.12 & gcc-2.96[2/4]

2001-11-09 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On 8 Nov 2001, Juan Quintela wrote: > > Hi > this patch fixes the abuse of ## in alsa sources. It was used > in ways that are not documented to work. It changes all the > apparitions to ways that work in all the compilers and do what they > are expected to do, changes are code of the fo

Re: [Alsa-devel] PATCH: Fixing compilation of 0.5.12 & gcc-2.96 [3/4]

2001-11-09 Thread Juan Quintela
> "jaroslav" == Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jaroslav> On 8 Nov 2001, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >> >> Hi >> >> This patch changes: >> >> #include >> >> by >> >> #include >> >> includding malloc.h produces warnings in 2.4. Notice that 2.2 also >> has slab.h with the same

Re: [Alsa-devel] PATCH: Fixing compilation of 0.5.12 & gcc-2.96 [2/4]

2001-11-09 Thread Juan Quintela
> "jaroslav" == Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jaroslav> On 8 Nov 2001, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >> Hi >> this patch fixes the abuse of ## in alsa sources. It was used >> in ways that are not documented to work. It changes all the >> apparitions to ways that work in all the com