[Alsa-devel] Re: Takashi, the via82xx patch I gave you is wrong!

[Takashi Iwai]

At Mon, 3 May 2004 19:24:33 -0400,
Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
 
 Hi Takashi,
 
 I tried all other numbers (1,2,4) and they generate xruns in
 aplay-soundcard which obviously suggests that they do not work. So, I guess
 3 is the only one that works with this particular setup.

thanks for the confirmation.
now fixed on CVS.  snd-via82xx driver should choose the 48k-fixed rate
automatically.


ciao,

Takashi


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Alsa-devel] Re: Takashi, the via82xx patch I gave you is wrong!

[Takashi Iwai]

Hi Ico!

At Mon, 3 May 2004 4:49:46 +,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi Takashi,
 
 Just realized that the dxs stuff needs to remain 3 (48k-only) after
 all for my notebook (m680x), otherwise I get evil xruns just using
 aplay - soundcard setup. My testing was flawed due to use of the new
 modprobe.conf. Hence, the patch should use the same vendor id/device
 id, but the setup should be 3 (48k-only). 

ok, i can change it to 3.

to be sure: does dxs_support=4 work?  it will allow the variable
bitrates but won't change the rate on AC97 codec.  mysteriously, this
works on some boards fine.  (even VIA guys don't know the reason about
this :)


thanks,

Takashi


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149alloc_id=8166op=click
___
Alsa-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel