On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
I attach a patch that fixes alsa-lib.
All it does it call snd_pcm_start() just before snd_pcm_wait() and due
to the if statement just above it, will only happen when the buffer is
going to be filled, therefore ensuring that even if
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:01:28PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
My point is, I don't think setting start_threshold to buffer_size is
even wrong at all. Some people might want the buffer to be full before
it starts, and my patch allows for that.
It's not wrong semantics. I see - it's
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:01:28PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
My point is, I don't think setting start_threshold to buffer_size is
even wrong at all. Some people might want the buffer to be full before
it starts, and my patch allows for
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:38:23PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
Otherwise, programs will work on some hardware and not others, which is
a case that should be minimized as much as possible; it's these kinds
of subtle differences that make it very hard to write reliable (sound,
video, etc)
Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:01:28PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
My point is, I don't think setting start_threshold to buffer_size is
even wrong at all. Some people might want the buffer to be full before
it starts, and my patch
Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Once thing I have noticed, is that with the alc650, we used to have VRA
(alsa 0.9.8), but the 1.0.2 intel8x0 driver ignores the VRA and fixes
itself at 48000.
So, before I never needed the
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Once thing I have noticed, is that with the alc650, we used to have VRA
(alsa 0.9.8), but the 1.0.2 intel8x0 driver ignores the VRA and fixes
itself at 48000.
So, before I never needed the sample rate converters, but as it now
fixes the rate at 48000, I need the
