Hi Felix, thank you.
--
It used to be pretty typical for PCI slots to share IRQs with onboard
devices. Take the sound out of slot three and put something else there,
and
most likely the something else will also share IRQ 17. Whether in newer
motherboards anything might have changed
A cheap solution with poor quality :)
http://zenbakaitz.servehttp.com
--
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and
José Luis Artuch composed on 2016-05-30 17:54 (UTC-0300):
> Is it correct that some soundcards have the same irq (onboard and third
> slot, irq 17) ?.
It used to be pretty typical for PCI slots to share IRQs with onboard
devices. Take the sound out of slot three and put something else there,
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Bill Unruh wrote:
> I still do not know what the difference between the UCA222 and UCA 202 is,
> except the latter is silver and the former red (and the latter is slightly
> more expensive.)
What I have understood, but I maybe wrong: The hardware is the same, but
the
Hello,
I installed 3 identical PCI soundcards in a PC which also has your
onboard sound card.
Running lspci -vmm I can see all 4 soundcards:
...
Slot: 00:1f.5
Class: Multimedia audio controller
Vendor: Intel Corporation
Device: 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller
SVendor:
I still do not know what the difference between the UCA222 and UCA 202 is,
except the latter is silver and the former red (and the latter is slightly
more expensive.)
There is also a version of the 202 which has a RIAA preamp built in (UFO202?)
This is for transfering vinyl to digital.
This is
The UCA222 I settled upon to buy came today and it is exactly
what I was looking for.
Thanks to all for the suggestions.
What I did to test recording was to
cat /dev/dsp1 >/dev/dsp since neither sound card should have been
active at the time. What you tend to get if you do
