T.P. Reitzel tpreitzel at hotmail.com writes:
Lee,
In a more compact form, here's the output of lspci -n :
00:00.0 Class 0600: 1106:0204
00:00.1 Class 0600: 1106:1204
00:00.2 Class 0600: 1106:2204
00:00.3 Class 0600: 1106:3204
00:00.4 Class 0600: 1106:4204
00:00.7 Class 0600:
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 09:05 -0700, T.P. Reitzel wrote:
I first mentioned this echo problem while experimenting with the
2.6.16.18 kernel. The problem is even worse now. Audio is totally
unusable. Although my PC hasn't hardlocked yet, it just might at some
point in the future. I simply
Lee,
In a more compact form, here's the output of lspci -n :
00:00.0 Class 0600: 1106:0204
00:00.1 Class 0600: 1106:1204
00:00.2 Class 0600: 1106:2204
00:00.3 Class 0600: 1106:3204
00:00.4 Class 0600: 1106:4204
00:00.7 Class 0600: 1106:7204
00:01.0 Class 0604: 1106:b188
00:0a.0 Class 0200:
I first mentioned this echo problem while experimenting with the
2.6.16.18 kernel. The problem is even worse now. Audio is totally
unusable. Although my PC hasn't hardlocked yet, it just might at some
point in the future. I simply changed from the 2.6.16.1 kernel which
works fine with ALSA to
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz+ UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort-
TAbort-
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 09:05 -0700, T.P. Reitzel wrote:
I first mentioned this echo problem while experimenting with the
2.6.16.18 kernel. The problem is even worse now. Audio is totally
unusable. Although my PC hasn't hardlocked yet, it just might at some
point in the future. I simply
Lee -
I don't know if I can explain it much better, but here's another
attempt. ANY sound just echoes for several seconds almost like the
problem is due to conflicting interrupts. If I play a brief tone ( 1
sec.), the tone will just echo for several seconds. Imagine listening to
a longer
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:54:48 -0400
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 11:39 -0700, T.P. Reitzel wrote:
Lee -
I don't know if I can explain it much better, but here's another
attempt. ANY sound just echoes for several seconds almost like the
problem is due to
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 22:37 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
2.6.17 is out according to
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.17
.
I said the first 2.6.17 -stable release meaning 2.6.17.1. The bug was
not found in time for 2.6.17.
Lee
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:42:55 -0400
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 22:37 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
2.6.17 is out according to
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.17
.
I said the first 2.6.17 -stable release meaning 2.6.17.1.
I am STILL getting this message from your ISP even though I have
repeatedly filled out the form. Please do not mail me again until
it's fixed or you have changed ISPs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
194.67.23.20 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 Access from ip address 216.158.38.3 blocked.
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 22:48 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
Is there any automagical formula allowing to know which non-rc kernel
is stable ?
I am not referring to stable in the conventional sense. -stable in
kernel development has a specific meaning - it refers to the bugfixes
applied to the
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:50:44 -0400
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am STILL getting this message from your ISP even though I have
repeatedly filled out the form. Please do not mail me again until
it's fixed or you have changed ISPs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
194.67.23.20 does not like
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 00:28 +0300, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
This problem goes away by itself.
Anyway, they are asking to fill a form from your, not somebody else's,
IP address, and the
http://win.mail.ru/cgi-bin/support_bl?ip=216.158.38.3 page has an
English form to be filled - see English
14 matches
Mail list logo