Re: [alto] [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18

2021-09-14 Thread Mike Bishop
> If the first paraphrase is more correct, the BCP 14 language would be "MAY", > but "is allowed to" or "can" are often used. If I can jump in, I think there is a slight distinction between the two. In my experience, a BCP 14 MAY has an implicit MUST to it -- if one party MAY take an action,

Re: [alto] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18

2021-09-14 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Hi, Jensen, On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 7:11 AM Jensen Zhang wrote: > Hi Spencer, > > Many thanks for your review. Please see my responses inline. > > Thanks, > Jensen > > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:41 AM Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > >> Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins >>

Re: [alto] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-unified-props-new-18

2021-09-14 Thread Jensen Zhang
Hi Spencer, Many thanks for your review. Please see my responses inline. Thanks, Jensen On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 4:41 AM Spencer Dawkins via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I'm sorry for running late on this review, and