Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-12-09 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Ben: Since the current document clearly state the specification of SLA details is out of scope, we authors prefer to make no change to changes unless I hear objection for this. Thanks Ben's clarification on BCP 18 question. It is a very useful discussion. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Benjamin

Re: [alto] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-17: (with COMMENT)

2021-12-09 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:44 AM Jensen Zhang wrote: > > What your text tells me is that your document describes what a valid >> instance of this media type's payload looks like. That's sort of obvious >> though. What RFC 6838 is asking for goes beyond that, and gives a few >> examples of what