Hi, Ben:
Since the current document clearly state the specification of SLA details is
out of scope, we authors prefer to make no change to changes unless I hear
objection for this.
Thanks Ben's clarification on BCP 18 question. It is a very useful discussion.
-Qin
-邮件原件-
发件人: Benjamin
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:44 AM Jensen Zhang
wrote:
>
> What your text tells me is that your document describes what a valid
>> instance of this media type's payload looks like. That's sort of obvious
>> though. What RFC 6838 is asking for goes beyond that, and gives a few
>> examples of what