Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00

2022-04-08 Thread kaigao
Hi Jordi, Thanks for reviewing the document! Best, Kai -Original Messages- From:"Jordi Ros Giralt" Sent Time:2022-04-08 13:03:03 (Friday) To: "kai...@scu.edu.cn" , "alto@ietf.org" Cc: Subject: Re: [alto] WGLC for draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-00 Hi Kai, I read this document

Re: [alto] I-Draft discussion - Supporting Bottleneck Structure Graphs in ALTO: Use Cases and Requirements

2022-04-08 Thread Jordi Ros Giralt
Copying over some questions that Qin asked in a separate conversation and including my answers: Regarding section 3, I am thinking whether this require interaction between overlay and underlay, one typical example is SDWAN use case described in

Re: [alto] Call for adoption: draft-zhang-alto-oam-yang

2022-04-08 Thread Danny Lachos
Hello ALTOers I support the adoption of this draft On 07.04.22 15:54, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote: +1, Best regards Sabine *From:*alto *On Behalf Of *Qiao Xiang *Sent:* Thursday, April 7, 2022 11:17 AM *To:* Luis M. Contreras *Cc:* roland.sch...@telekom.de;

Re: [alto] Call for adoption: draft-zhang-alto-oam-yang

2022-04-08 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi all, This message concludes this call for adoption. Given the fair amount of support and that no objection was made, the draft is adopted. Authors, please submit the draft as draft-ietf-alto-oam-yang at your convenience. The -00 is pre-validated. No need to reflect the comments from

Re: [alto] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7285 (6876)

2022-04-08 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Med and All: I think the tradition is the AD steps in and verify updated text based on discussion and agreement on the list. I agree to add " Note: " make proposal more clear. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: alto [mailto:alto-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 mohamed.boucad...@orange.com 发送时间: 2022年4月8日 12:47