Re: [alto] 2nd WGLC draft-ietf-alto-new-transport (Ends 01/06/2023)

2023-06-01 Thread kaigao
Hi Med and all, Sure! We will prepare a new revision shortly based on the comments. We would also like to thanks the reviewers for the wonderful comments. Best, Kai -Original Messages- From:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Sent Time:2023-06-01 22:35:59 (Thursday) To: "IETF ALTO

Re: [alto] 2nd WGLC draft-ietf-alto-new-transport (Ends 01/06/2023)

2023-06-01 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi all, The WGLC is now closed for the document. No objection/ major issues were raised against progressing this specification. However, there are few minor comments [1]/edits[2] that need to be addressed before we send the document to the IESG for publication. Authors, can you please prepare

Re: [alto] 2nd WGLC draft-ietf-alto-new-transport (Ends 01/06/2023)

2023-05-31 Thread mengtong
s in each scenario, like those listed in Section 7.2. (not sure this is necessary though) ** Section 7.1 To keep the context clear, you may explicitly point to the example given in Section 6.3. ----------- Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 06:56:23 +0000 From: To: &quo

[alto] 2nd WGLC draft-ietf-alto-new-transport (Ends 01/06/2023)

2023-05-25 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi all, The authors believe that they addressed the comments raised during the 1st WGLC and also from the various directorate. This message starts the second WGLC for the transport draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-new-transport/09/. The WGLC runs for one week, i.e.,