Hi Christian,
We made two changes to address your comments. Please see below.
>
> > > * Allowing decimals into the cost metric identifier introduces a dot
> which
> > > is reserved as per RFC7285 Section 10.6.
> >
> > Yes. Correct. From the grammar above, we made sure that we would not
> > intr
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 2:54 AM Christian Amsüss
wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:43:50PM -0400, Y. Richard Yang wrote:
> > Good comment. The document gives the high-level grammar (1 line) at the
> > beginning of Sec. 2.2.
> > It looks that your suggestion is
Hello Richard,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:43:50PM -0400, Y. Richard Yang wrote:
> Good comment. The document gives the high-level grammar (1 line) at the
> beginning of Sec. 2.2.
> It looks that your suggestion is the write out the complete grammar upfront:
I was not so much looking for the detai
Hi Christian,
Thank you so much for the review. Please see below.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:02 AM Christian Amsüss via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Christian Amsüss
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> ## Summary for the IoT Directorate
>
> This document extends the Appl
Reviewer: Christian Amsüss
Review result: Ready with Issues
## Summary for the IoT Directorate
This document extends the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO)
protocol, by which applications that need to a peer from a selection can ask
their uplink for preferences. It adds more fine-grain