发件人: Klaas Wierenga via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> > 发送时间: 2021年11月24日 17:24
> > 收件人: sec...@ietf.org
> > 抄送: alto@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto....@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org
> > 主题: Secdir last call review of
> draft-ietf-alto-cdni-r
g;
> last-c...@ietf.org
> 主题: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto-17
>
> Reviewer: Klaas Wierenga
> Review result: Has Issues
>
> Hi,
>
> I found 1 nit and one more substantial issue
>
> - the abstract says:
>
> OLD
Hi, Klaas:
-邮件原件-
发件人: Klaas Wierenga via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
发送时间: 2021年11月24日 17:24
收件人: sec...@ietf.org
抄送: alto@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto@ietf.org;
last-c...@ietf.org
主题: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing
Reviewer: Klaas Wierenga
Review result: Has Issues
Hi,
I found 1 nit and one more substantial issue
- the abstract says:
OLD
RFC 8008 defines precisely the semantics of FCI and provides guidelines on the
FCI protocol, but the exact protocol is specified.
I think it should read
NEW
RFC 8008
