Re: [alto] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17

2021-10-23 Thread Y. Richard Yang
Hi Christian, We made two changes to address your comments. Please see below. > > > > * Allowing decimals into the cost metric identifier introduces a dot > which > > > is reserved as per RFC7285 Section 10.6. > > > > Yes. Correct. From the grammar above, we made sure that we would not > >

Re: [alto] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17

2021-10-21 Thread Y. Richard Yang
Hi Christian, On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 2:54 AM Christian Amsüss wrote: > Hello Richard, > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:43:50PM -0400, Y. Richard Yang wrote: > > Good comment. The document gives the high-level grammar (1 line) at the > > beginning of Sec. 2.2. > > It looks that your suggestion is

Re: [alto] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17

2021-10-19 Thread Christian Amsüss
Hello Richard, On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 03:43:50PM -0400, Y. Richard Yang wrote: > Good comment. The document gives the high-level grammar (1 line) at the > beginning of Sec. 2.2. > It looks that your suggestion is the write out the complete grammar upfront: I was not so much looking for the

Re: [alto] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-17

2021-10-18 Thread Y. Richard Yang
Hi Christian, Thank you so much for the review. Please see below. On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:02 AM Christian Amsüss via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Christian Amsüss > Review result: Ready with Issues > > ## Summary for the IoT Directorate > > This document extends the