Re: [alto] unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector - registry

...@gmail.com [mailto:yang.r.y...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Y. Richard Yang Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2018 12:44 AM To: Jensen Zhang Cc: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) ; alto@ietf.org Subject: Re: [alto] unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector - registry Hi Jensen, Thanks for the

Re: [alto] unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector - registry

Hi Jensen, Thanks for the comments. Please see below. On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Jensen Zhang wrote: > Hi Sabine, all > > Let me post some considerations on this topic. Please see my comments > inline. > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:17 AM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - > FR/Paris-Saclay) wro

Re: [alto] unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector - registry

Hi Sabine, all Let me post some considerations on this topic. Please see my comments inline. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:17 AM Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote: > Hi Jensen, Kai, Vijay, all > > > > Thanks all for this discussion on registries, which needs a separate > thread so

Re: [alto] unified-props, cellular addresses and path-vector - registry

Hi Jensen, Kai, Vijay, all Thanks all for this discussion on registries, which needs a separate thread so I added “registry” to the initial thread. The ALTO Entity Domain Registry of the Unified Properties (UP) draft is to be seen as an extension of the ALTO Address Type Registry specified in RF