Hello,
Here is a couple of questions...
1) I beleive gzip command is activated by the dumper, not by the
taper? Am I right?
2) In case I want to speed up gzip, what should I increase on my
system? CPU? Memory? I have a dedicated Pentium III 800 as amanda
server, and I do gzip best on
Jason,
>So, two questions: Does anyone know what causes an "exit(33)" in gcc
>(cc1)? And has *anybody* successfully compiled sst on Intel Solaris 7, or
>should I give up and go make better use of my time by smoking a fat rock
>instead?
have you asked on GNU lists/news too? It seems to me it is a
Dave,
>Amanda is installed and configured on SUN Ultra I, Solaris 8. I don't
>have a tape drive physically connected to this machine, I am accessing
>a tape device on another SUN box.
Run amlabel on the machine with the tape drive...
You anyway need physical access to that machine, if only to
Well, problem solved... sort of. It seems that gcc on Sol7 (i386) is
simply incapable of compiling sst. Fortunately, I learned that I had a
copy of Sun's CC available here, so I tried that and she compiled with no
problem!
Now, if I can only get everything configured properly, I might just make
t
On Mon, 04 Jun 2001, Sandra Panesso wrote:
> Hi everybody:
>
> I have a HP surestore 24X6 autoloader and I using chg-zd-mtx
> configuration file with
> dev /dev/nst0
> scsitapedev /dev/sgb
> startuse 0
> enduse5
> statfile /usr/loc
I had a similar problem with amanda 2.4.1p2 on Solaris 8 client (no
auditing..).
After much of the same kinds of debugging techniques (this list is
great!) I discovered that the client side amandad was dying due to
inability to find a shared library. The problem only showed up when
amandad was
Files restored with no problem at all.
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, John R. Jackson wrote:
> >Amanda backs-up both machines and the solaris machine (the host) has
> >my tape unit configured on it.
>
> Understood.
>
> >Can I not restore client images to the client machine?
> >(since my host and cli
Some more details of my problem:
I can get sst to compile on SPARC. It gives me the same exact warnings as
on the Intel box. No problem... as per the docs, these warnings can be
ignored.
So, I truss'd gcc on the two boxes to see where things go wrong, and this
is what I found...
Both boxes fork
Hi everybody:
I have a HP surestore 24X6 autoloader and I using chg-zd-mtx
configuration file with
dev /dev/nst0
scsitapedev /dev/sgb
startuse0
enduse 5
statfile/usr/local/etc/amanda/miro_daily/tape0-slot
the thing is that I hav
This is when I manually ran it.
# cat amandad.out.63688
Sat Jun 2 10:20:24 PDT 2001: starting amandad
Sat Jun 2 10:20:54 PDT 2001: amandad done: status is 1
more /tmp/amanda/amandad.xxx.debug
amandad: debug 1 pid 63690 ruid 0 euid 0 start time Sat Jun 2 10:20:24
2001
[compile info - snip]
When I try to label a tape, I get the following:
hcuxtstest01% amlabel archive archive00
rewinding
amlabel: no tape online
Amanda is installed and configured on SUN Ultra I, Solaris 8. I don't have a tape
drive physically connected to this machine, I am accessing a tape device on another
SUN
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 03:41:15PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> I've been lurking for about a day, but haven't seen any messages that
> relate to my problem.
>
> Specifically, even though I've recompiled amanda with the changer device
> (/dev/sg/2) defined, no amanda tape utils c
Hi Paul, Hi John,
>I use the little perl-script in attachment to measure my tapespeed.
>Use like:
On the first step, I used Paul perl script to try to get the minimum
transfer rate needed to keep the tape streaming.
I used the script with various buffer size, until the tape stopped
streaming.
13 matches
Mail list logo
