Re: Dump, and ResierFS?

2001-10-12 Thread Philippe Amelant
le jeu 11-10-2001 à 17:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: I'm seting up to backup a Debina Linux machine that has ResierFS filesystems. Is there a version of dump for this? Or must I use Gnu tar? Hi Hans has said on a number of occasions that tar is

Re: Problems with setting up amanda

2001-10-12 Thread Joose Vettenranta
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 06:04:48PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: Since the attachment says its pgp encoded, and none of us on this list have your public key to reply to, let alone the private key to decode it, you may be asking a bit much to expect an answer. That is weard, because I just

amrecover confused by tapedev 0 config

2001-10-12 Thread John Dalbec
I'm using the tapedev 0 configuration style for chg-scsi as suggested in TAPE.CHANGERS. This confuses amrecover, which expects to see 0 as a valid tape device rather than looking for the changer config file to determine the correct tape device. Yes, I can use the settape(sp?) command, but it's

Re: Dump, and ResierFS?

2001-10-12 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On 12 Oct 2001 at 9:36am, Philippe Amelant wrote Hans has said on a number of occasions that tar is the way to go. is this true for all filesystem type ? That's a matter of opinion (and religion to some people, it seems). tar is the way to go for ResierFS b/c there *is* no dump. There is

Re: Solaris file system snapshots

2001-10-12 Thread Ronan KERYELL
Jon Has anyone attempted to perform amanda backups on Solaris 8 Jon systems by first taking a static snapshot (new Sol8 feature) of Jon the file system? Jon I can see conceptually how it would be done. But as the Jon snapshots have a different device name and are mounted on

Re: NAK: amandad busy from unfinishing selfchecks

2001-10-12 Thread Chris Marble
peanut butter wrote: Hi, I'm using version 2.4.2p2 of Amanda. For a particular client on which I use tar with Amanda to back up a single directory, this entry has worked fine until I aborted an amdump several days ago (at least I think these are connected). The next amdump (or one very

Re: NAK: amandad busy from unfinishing selfchecks

2001-10-12 Thread peanut butter
-In response to your message- --received from Chris Marble-- I've got a mix of 2.4.2 and 2.4.2p2 on Linux, Solaris, HP-UX and IRIX systems. I'm using varients of dump everywhere. I've never had a problem with amanda processes restarting once I got them killed. Have you run an amcleanup

tape drive cleaning

2001-10-12 Thread John Dalbec
Does amanda take it upon herself to clean the tape drive after a certain amount of use? If so, how is this controlled? The manual for our tape drive says to clean it only when the front panel display requests it. Thanks, John

Re: Dump, and ResierFS?

2001-10-12 Thread Dietmar Goldbeck
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 09:36:15AM +0200, Philippe Amelant wrote: le jeu 11-10-2001 à 17:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: I'm seting up to backup a Debina Linux machine that has ResierFS filesystems. Is there a version of dump for this? Or must I

failed because no blank tapes

2001-10-12 Thread Alan Pham
Hi, When there's no more blank tape available, amanda just quits and reports the running or not-yet-run file systems as FAILED. Is there a way to have amanda keep dumping those running or not-yet-run file systems to the holding disk? That way I won't miss backing up thoese file systems.

Re: tape drive cleaning

2001-10-12 Thread Dan Wilder
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 04:07:06PM -0400, John Dalbec wrote: Does amanda take it upon herself to clean the tape drive after a certain amount of use? If so, how is this controlled? The manual for our tape drive says to clean it only when the front panel display requests it. Thanks, John

Re: failed because no blank tapes

2001-10-12 Thread Bernhard R. Erdmann
When there's no more blank tape available, amanda just quits and reports the running or not-yet-run file systems as FAILED. Is there a way to have amanda keep dumping those running or not-yet-run file systems to the holding disk? That way I won't miss backing up thoese file systems.