tapetype Tandberg VS80 DLT

2002-09-18 Thread Mozzi
As requested in the readme I post this back to the list. Tnx to Paul Bijnens for the new patched tapetype define tapetype tandberg_VS80 { comment "just produced by tapetype prog (hardware compression off)" length 38602 mbytes filemark 0 kbytes speed 2781 kps }

nice web based frontend

2002-09-18 Thread Neil
Hi guys, My amanda is now up and running. I can backup and restore filesystems now. But there is one thing that I noticed that really brought me to the point where I ask myself "why did it do it?". I was backing up /var and it has only 20 megs only and I got 4gig in my tape. I executed su ama

Re: readline & termcap libraries?.

2002-09-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:59:48AM -0400, Oleg Svintsitski wrote: > Hi Group, > > Can anyone advise -- which version of readline library should be used?.. > GNU site has v4.3, while the amanda docs recommend 2.2, so does that > matter?.. > > Also, should readline use termcap (there is 1.3.1 dat

Re: Can Amanda put its index on a tape?

2002-09-18 Thread Anthony Valentine
Having a copy of the previous dump's index at the beginning of the a tape, along with a utility that reads the tape and generates an index of the data currently on it would work fine. Way back when I owned a 486, I had a tape drive (an Eagle Travan if I remember correctly) that did that. Since I

Re: Can Amanda put its index on a tape?

2002-09-18 Thread Niall O Broin
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:29:58PM -0800, Anthony Valentine wrote: > Question: Can Amanda be setup so that it writes a copy of it's indexes > to the beginning of each tape? > > I realize that I can add the filesystem that holds the indexes to my > disklist, but then I won't know where on the ta

Can Amanda put its index on a tape?

2002-09-18 Thread Anthony Valentine
Hello everyone. Question: Can Amanda be setup so that it writes a copy of it's indexes to the beginning of each tape? I realize that I can add the filesystem that holds the indexes to my disklist, but then I won't know where on the tape it is. If it were always the first thing after the label

Re: Tape DDS-3 values

2002-09-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:36:26PM +0200, Brian Jonnes wrote: > On Thu 12 Sep 02 16:38, Niall O Broin wrote: > > This is true but as a friend pointed out to me recently when I was having > > some tape reading problems - if you get some bit errors reading a tar file > > from a tape, most likely asl

Re: [Amanda-users] Re: Tape DDS-3 values

2002-09-18 Thread Jason Thomas
we had the same problem, we now store the data uncompressed on the tape. And still get frequent errors. On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:14:46PM +0100, Niall O Broin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:25:29AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > > Is it a real, or theoretical, problem? I.e. has anybody exp

RE: Deja vu all over again

2002-09-18 Thread Martinez, Michael - CSREES/ISTM
I am already aware of the problem, have fixed it, and taken care of it. Instead of posting to the whole list, you could have just emailed me about it and I would have taken care of it thank you very much Michael Martinez System Administrator > -Original Message- > From: Mitch Collinswo

Re: Deja vu all over again

2002-09-18 Thread Todd Kover
> What's up with last week's postings getting re-injected into the list? I've removed a bunch of queued up messages from last week, blocked the originating site and sent mail mail to their postmasters. In the future, if you see someone doing this, please let [EMAIL PROTECTED] know, and if you

Re: Deja vu all over again

2002-09-18 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
Here's the relevent section of headers: Received: from pwd.reeusda.gov ([192.73.224.125]) by surly.omniscient.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8IImln797017 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:48:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from reeusda.gov - 192.73.224.2 by pwd.reeusda.go

Re: Deja vu all over again

2002-09-18 Thread Samuel Nicolary
I thought I was going crazy - thanks for confirming that I am not. -- Sam Nicolary On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Frank Smith wrote: > What's up with last week's postings getting re-injected into the list? > > Frank > > -- > Frank Smith[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Deja vu all over again

2002-09-18 Thread Frank Smith
What's up with last week's postings getting re-injected into the list? Frank -- Frank Smith[EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Administrator Voice: 512-374-4673 Hoover's Online F

RE: tape error

2002-09-18 Thread Rebecca Pakish
No, actually I think it means it's not rewound (Is this a word? Bah!). Try doing an mt -f /dev/nst0 rewind and then run an amcheck on that tape and see if it's happy. -Original Message- From: John Koenig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 1:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTEC

Dumpcycles vs Runs

2002-09-18 Thread Jason Greenberg
You'll have to excuse my newbieness for this one, if you would... If I have a dumpcycle of 7 days, with 7 runs per cylce, I understand that I will have a full backup every 7 days. So, if that's the case, here are my questions: 1) How many tapes are used for these 7 runs? 7? or just 1? 2) does

Re: Measure and Graph Tape Usage

2002-09-18 Thread Galen Johnson
Jason Greenberg wrote: >Is there any way to measure how many bytes where written to the tape >every night? I would like to feed the values to MRTG or something, so I >can see when I am close to using two tapes per dump. > >Also, if the data is available, is it the raw uncompressed bytes, or the

tape error

2002-09-18 Thread John Koenig
Anyone seen this tape error message before? Does this indicate a bad tape or a tape wherein the AMANDA label has been inadvertently removed? thanks, J ### Subject: DailySet2 AMFLUSH MAIL REPORT FOR September 13, 2002 *** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [reading label: No space

Re: Dumpcycles vs Runs

2002-09-18 Thread Niall O Broin
On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 12:57:15PM -0400, Jason Greenberg wrote: > > If I have a dumpcycle of 7 days, with 7 runs per cylce, I understand > that I will have a full backup every 7 days. So, if that's the case, > here are my questions: > > 1) How many tapes are used for these 7 runs? 7? or just

Measure and Graph Tape Usage

2002-09-18 Thread Jason Greenberg
Is there any way to measure how many bytes where written to the tape every night? I would like to feed the values to MRTG or something, so I can see when I am close to using two tapes per dump. Also, if the data is available, is it the raw uncompressed bytes, or the post-gzipped bytes that are r

Re: Tape DDS-3 values

2002-09-18 Thread Niall O Broin
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:25:29AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > Is it a real, or theoretical, problem? I.e. has anybody experienced bit errors > in a gzip'ed document? For me the incidence is low enough that I don't feel a > need to use bzip2 for that extra protection. The value of your data ma

Re: tape error

2002-09-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 11:55:31AM -0700, John Koenig wrote: > > Anyone seen this tape error message before? > > Does this indicate a bad tape or a tape wherein the AMANDA label has > been inadvertently removed? > > thanks, > J > > > ### > > > Subject: DailySet2 AMFLUSH

Re: Measure and Graph Tape Usage

2002-09-18 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 14 September 2002 12:44, Jason Greenberg wrote: >Is there any way to measure how many bytes where written to the > tape every night? I would like to feed the values to MRTG or > something, so I can see when I am close to using two tapes per > dump. > >Also, if the data is available, i

Re: Dumpcycles vs Runs

2002-09-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 12:57:15PM -0400, Jason Greenberg wrote: > You'll have to excuse my newbieness for this one, if you would... > > If I have a dumpcycle of 7 days, with 7 runs per cylce, I understand > that I will have a full backup every 7 days. So, if that's the case, > here are my ques

Re: [Amanda-users] Re: Tape DDS-3 values

2002-09-18 Thread Frank Smith
Good drives and tapes rarely have errors. If you are getting frequent tape errors you should investigate why; your tapes and/or drives could be in need of cleaning/repair/replacement. Since failing drives and tapes don't get better, just worse, you will be continually adding more workarounds (s

Re: Dumpcycles vs Runs

2002-09-18 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 14 September 2002 12:57, Jason Greenberg wrote: >You'll have to excuse my newbieness for this one, if you would... > >If I have a dumpcycle of 7 days, with 7 runs per cylce, I > understand that I will have a full backup every 7 days. So, if > that's the case, here are my questions: >

Re: Measure and Graph Tape Usage

2002-09-18 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 13 September 2002 13:17, Galen Johnson wrote: >Jason Greenberg wrote: >>Is there any way to measure how many bytes where written to the >> tape every night? I would like to feed the values to MRTG or >> something, so I can see when I am close to using two tapes per >> dump. >> >>Also, i

Antigen Notification:Antigen found FILE FILTER= *.exe file

2002-09-18 Thread ANTIGEN_WENDY
Antigen for Exchange found selfcheck.exe matching FILE FILTER= *.exe file filter. The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re: win32", was sent from JC Simonetti and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at Cognex/Tokyo/WENDY.

Antigen Notification:Antigen found FILE FILTER= *.exe file

2002-09-18 Thread ANTIGEN_WENDY
Antigen for Exchange found selfcheck.exe matching FILE FILTER= *.exe file filter. The file is currently Removed. The message, "Re: win32", was sent from JC Simonetti and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at Cognex/Tokyo/WENDY.

Re: Help please

2002-09-18 Thread Neil
Hey guys, thanks for that massive replies :) Anyway, My system is FreeBSD 4.6 STABLE. I've tried reinstalling amanda but this time, using the ports and not from the the source. I think, it's almost the same as ports grabs the source file. Anyway, I modified the Makefile in /usr/ports/misc/am

Re: amanda/iptables problem

2002-09-18 Thread John Dalbec
Galen Johnson wrote: > John Dalbec wrote: > >> I sometimes get sendsize packets being dropped by iptables, presumably >> because the iptables connection tracking decided the UDP connection >> was closed. This causes the estimates to take much longer because the >> first sendsize process giv

Re: readline & termcap libraries?.

2002-09-18 Thread John P. Looney
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:59:48AM -0400, Oleg Svintsitski mentioned: > I am putting all that together on SPARC Solaris 8 (if that matters..) > Your advices will be deeply appreciated. I'd advise visiting www.sunfreeware.com and getting the solaris 8 Amanda package - it's what I did, and saved m

Re: Comments in .amandahosts

2002-09-18 Thread Paul Bijnens
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 18 September 2002 08:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>Is it possible to add some comments in the .amandahosts file ? For >>example: >> >># this is my comment bla bla bla bla >>192.168.200.200 amandauser >> > > Good Q Marc, all I can say is I don't have

Re: help for compiling amanda to support xfsdump in RH 7.3

2002-09-18 Thread Zhen Liu
Hi Joshua: I tried to recompile amanda client to support xfsdump...and followed the four steps you mentioned below...for some reason, it still can not backup xfs volume on that client...so, I am wondering that something must be wrong when I was doing the recompiling... Could you please give me a

readline & termcap libraries?.

2002-09-18 Thread Oleg Svintsitski
Title: readline & termcap libraries?. Hi Group, Can anyone  advise -- which version of readline library should be used?.. GNU site has v4.3, while the amanda docs recommend 2.2, so does that matter?.. Also, should readline use termcap (there is 1.3.1 dated last month or so..) or ncurses?.. I

newbie needs help deciphering vauge error message

2002-09-18 Thread John P. Looney
Hi, I think I've managed to setup amanda to backup my desktop PC from a central backup server. amcheck returns all is well, so I decided to run "amdump daily". I've attached the dump report below. Could someone point me in the directions of some diagnostics ? (BTW, I'm incredibly impressed b

Re: Comments in .amandahosts

2002-09-18 Thread marc . bigler
Well looks like comments starting with # in .amandahosts works, I added a few line of comments in it and did an amcheck, no errors where returned... Marc

Re: Comments in .amandahosts

2002-09-18 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 08:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi there, > >Is it possible to add some comments in the .amandahosts file ? For > example: > ># this is my comment bla bla bla bla >192.168.200.200 amandauser > >Regards >Marc Good Q Marc, all I can say is I don't have any i

Comments in .amandahosts

2002-09-18 Thread marc . bigler
Hi there, Is it possible to add some comments in the .amandahosts file ? For example: # this is my comment bla bla bla bla 192.168.200.200 amandauser Regards Marc

Re: Help please

2002-09-18 Thread Mozzi
Neil wrote: > Is someone out there kind enough to share a good howto on installing > amanda? > I am planning to reinstall my non-working f** amanda. I have tried the > INSTALL file that comes with it. I also have posted earlier about the issue > I was encountering but never had any replies to

Re: Colorado, again

2002-09-18 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 07:03, Brian Jonnes wrote: >Hi all, > >Still gnashing my teeth over this HP Colorado drive. Found some > pointers which suggested disabling DMA -- have done so for both > drives on that controller. Got 3 successful dumps since Thursday > (>3GB written). > >The proble

Re: Help please

2002-09-18 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 06:33, Neil wrote: >Is someone out there kind enough to share a good howto on > installing amanda? I am planning to reinstall my non-working > f** amanda. I have tried the INSTALL file that comes with it. > I also have posted earlier about the issue I was encount

Re: Help please

2002-09-18 Thread Stefan Hellwig
Hi! On Wednesday 18 September 2002 12:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is someone out there kind enough to share a good howto on installing > amanda? I can recommend this one: http://www.storagemountain.com/amanda.html It helped me installing AMANDA and I think it is very well written. Regards, S

Colorado, again

2002-09-18 Thread Brian Jonnes
Hi all, Still gnashing my teeth over this HP Colorado drive. Found some pointers which suggested disabling DMA -- have done so for both drives on that controller. Got 3 successful dumps since Thursday (>3GB written). The problem today is as follows. The dumps failed with an "Input/Output erro

Re: Help please

2002-09-18 Thread Dan Wilder
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:33:52AM -0500, Neil wrote: > Is someone out there kind enough to share a good howto on installing amanda? > I am planning to reinstall my non-working f** amanda. I have tried the > INSTALL file that comes with it. I also have posted earlier about the issue > I was

Help please

2002-09-18 Thread Neil
Is someone out there kind enough to share a good howto on installing amanda? I am planning to reinstall my non-working f** amanda. I have tried the INSTALL file that comes with it. I also have posted earlier about the issue I was encountering but never had any replies to that POST. Thanks.

Re: tapetype problem (now)

2002-09-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 08:48:45AM +0200, Mozzi wrote: > HI > Yes it is updateing I am now on the second set of numbers > [root@ais-back01 tape-src]# ./tapetype -e 40960 -f /dev/nst0 -t TandbergVS80 > wrote 1235460 32Kb blocks in 102955 files in 275434 seconds (short write) > wrote 701742 32kb blo

Re: tapetype problem (again)

2002-09-18 Thread Paul Bijnens
Mozzi wrote: > Paul Bijnens wrote: > >> Mozzi wrote: >> >>> HI >>> Yes it is updateing I am now on the second set of numbers >>> [root@ais-back01 tape-src]# ./tapetype -e 40960 -f /dev/nst0 -t >>> TandbergVS80 >>> wrote 1235460 32Kb blocks in 102955 files in 275434 seconds (short >>> write) >>>

Re: win32

2002-09-18 Thread JC Simonetti
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:58:26 -0400 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], JC Simonetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Well... You're right, I got the actual state of the Sourceforge > project and did not touch to anything to the sources. Everything

Re: tapetype problem (now)

2002-09-18 Thread Paul Bijnens
Mozzi wrote: > HI > Yes it is updateing I am now on the second set of numbers > [root@ais-back01 tape-src]# ./tapetype -e 40960 -f /dev/nst0 -t > TandbergVS80 > wrote 1235460 32Kb blocks in 102955 files in 275434 seconds (short write) > wrote 701742 32kb blocks in 116977 files > > It is still bu