Re: index tee cannot write [Connection timed out] ??

2002-12-20 Thread Steve Loughran
Finally solved the problems 1 - The amanda host had a secondary IP alias on the LAN NIC, and Amanda was swapping between the two IPs for its source address. Thats fine for clients on the LAN, but the firewall didnt like that much... 2 - Once that had been fixed, I found a nasty `bug` in my

Initial disk of amrecover set up incorrectly

2002-12-20 Thread Toralf Lund
amrecover will in my setup make a completely wrong guess about what disk to consider at startup in most cases. The example output included below should illustrate the problem; /usr/freeware/apache is not on the /u filesystem, and it has a separate disklist entry. Any ideas what is going on?

SUMMARY: Problem with chg-zd-mtx with EZ17 stacker

2002-12-20 Thread Peter Stokes
Hi Gene In this script there is no wait timer, just a repeated look at the tape status, which is better. The resolution after a few hours trial and error was to add 'sleep' commands between the tape movement and/or echo commands in the chg-zd-mtx script. It looks like the next command is issued

cant switch to incremental dump

2002-12-20 Thread ahall
Greetings, (I sent a mail about this a few days ago, so if I am duplicating info please forgive) I still cannot get one of my disks to dump correctly. It is reporting the error can't switch to incremental dump. I have unforced the dump w/ amadmin just in case. I have a tape with more then

Re[2]: Can't setup amanda backup for localhost

2002-12-20 Thread Vlad
It is really that service amanda in '/etc/xinetd.d/amanda' was disabled. /etc/xinetd.d/amanda (should be) # default: off # description: The client for the Amanda backup system.\ # This must be on for systems being backed up\ # by Amanda. service amanda {

Re: SUMMARY: Problem with chg-zd-mtx with EZ17 stacker

2002-12-20 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 20 December 2002 06:54, Peter Stokes wrote: Hi Gene In this script there is no wait timer, just a repeated look at the tape status, which is better. The resolution after a few hours trial and error was to add 'sleep' commands between the tape movement and/or echo commands in the

Help with AMRESTORE

2002-12-20 Thread wab
Greetings. I'm attempting to recover a filesystem which is about 15-18 gigs in size. Amanda is using Tar to compress its archives... I tried to restore the image to a filesystem large enough to handle the data, before moving back to the original location; but I got a File size limit exceeded. (It

Re: cant switch to incremental dump

2002-12-20 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:16:54AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, (I sent a mail about this a few days ago, so if I am duplicating info please forgive) I still cannot get one of my disks to dump correctly. It is reporting the error can't switch to incremental dump. I have

Re: Help with AMRESTORE

2002-12-20 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 at 11:26am, wab wrote Greetings. I'm attempting to recover a filesystem which is about 15-18 gigs in size. Amanda is using Tar to compress its archives... I tried to restore the image to a filesystem large enough to handle the data, before moving back to the original

Re: Help with AMRESTORE

2002-12-20 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:26:07AM -0500, wab enlightened us: Greetings. I'm attempting to recover a filesystem which is about 15-18 gigs in size. Amanda is using Tar to compress its archives... I tried to restore the image to a filesystem large enough to handle the data, before moving back to

Re: Help with AMRESTORE

2002-12-20 Thread Jason Brooks
Hello, if you are using amrestore to grab the image from tape, then: cd working directory amrestore -p [and other options] | tar -xpf - the -p option in amrestore outputs the datastream to a pipe (stdout). this sets up the buffering correctly. the -p option in tar will restore the files

Re: cant switch to incremental dump

2002-12-20 Thread Jason Brooks
Hello, Am I reading you correctly that you haven't gotten a full dump yet and amanda is displaying 'can't switch to incremental dump'? If this is the case, read on... Do you have the parameter reserve set in your amanda.conf file? if not, it defaults to 100%. this means that the holding disk

Re: not secure port

2002-12-20 Thread KEVIN ZEMBOWER
Steve, I had this exact problem. The problem is that the way NAT is done is to choose an arbitrary port number and associate it with an IP inside the NAT. Search the archive of this list for Amanda through translated addresses where Pedro Caria shared with me a patch to remove the port check

Re: cant switch to incremental dump

2002-12-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:51:52AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:16:54AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, (I sent a mail about this a few days ago, so if I am duplicating info please forgive) I still cannot get one of my disks to dump

Re: not secure port

2002-12-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 03:52:03PM -0500, KEVIN ZEMBOWER wrote: Steve, I had this exact problem. The problem is that the way NAT is done is to choose an arbitrary port number and associate it with an IP inside the NAT. Search the archive of this list for Amanda through translated addresses

uninitialized value in printf

2002-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jean-Louis, Version is Amanda 2.4.3 running on 2.4.19-r6 Gentoo linux, ppc. (there's no Amanda ebuild script available for Gentoo, btw, if anyone more capable than I is interested in hacking one up:o)) To be more descriptive, these errors appear after I initiate a dump then call