Hi,
1.) i hope you only have one of the lines (A) and (B) in your
amanda.conf at the same time, don't you?
2.) line (A) is the correct one for chg-scsi
3.) remove each and every comment from your chg-scsi.conf file, they
sometimes confuse chg-scsi.
hope it helps
Christoph
Bruntel, Mitchell
Hi,
One of my systems that backs up 4 clients last night failed on 1 of the
clients. The other 3 were ok. I have gone through and checked everything,
restarted xinetd on the client, but still the same error.
Has anyone seen
WARNING: : selfcheck reply timed out
This is on amanda-2.4.4 on
Tom Brown wrote:
...
WARNING: : selfcheck reply timed out
...
i have managed to fix this - seems the OS partition on the client was at
100% and so this was causing the check to fail. Maybe the error could have
been a bit more descriptive!
But probably because the OS partition was full, the OS
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 10:43, Anders Norrbring wrote:
I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a nice and
friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering and job
control in?
Exactly what led you to think that ? Can you provide references ? The idea of
Have I misunderstood the whole concept here?
I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a nice
and
friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering and job
control in?
No X interface. But of course, you can use any X-capable editor to edit
the
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 04:01, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Hi,
1.) i hope you only have one of the lines (A) and (B) in your
amanda.conf at the same time, don't you?
2.) line (A) is the correct one for chg-scsi
3.) remove each and every comment from your chg-scsi.conf file, they
sometimes confuse
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 06:21, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Have I misunderstood the whole concept here?
I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a
nice
and
friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering
and job control in?
No X interface. But
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Well, me too.. But, there are others using the system, and the don't always
'settle' for a nightly backup of entire systems. They need (for a reason
I'm too stupid to understand) backups every now and then of files they need
to archive immediately (at any time *sigh*)
Hi,
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 04:01, Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Hi,
1.) i hope you only have one of the lines (A) and (B) in your
amanda.conf at the same time, don't you?
2.) line (A) is the correct one for chg-scsi
3.) remove each and every comment from your chg-scsi.conf
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Well, me too.. But, there are others using the system, and the don't
always
'settle' for a nightly backup of entire systems. They need (for a
reason
I'm too stupid to understand) backups every now and then of files they
need
to archive immediately (at any
sorry, too much DISCOVERY channel...
I'm (still) in process of cycling through my tape pool for
my new jukebox. I was out last friday and the latest tapes
hadn't been labeled and we wrote what we could to spool to
the holding area.
Is there anyway to pre-select tape labels and apply them
Not: Bilinmeyen kelimelerin anlamlari asagidadir.
Cevabinizi [EMAIL PROTECTED] adresine gonderiniz.
ALTINCI MESELE
Risale-i Nur'un ok yerlerinde izahi ve kat' hadsiz hccetleri bulunan iman-i billh
rknnn binler kll burhanlarindan birtek burhana kisaca bir isarettir.
Kastamonu'da lise
Hi Amanda Users,
This is my first post in that list.
I'm using/testing amanda by 4 weeks and now I have a doubt about confs in amanda.conf.
My scenario is:
1 - I need to do daily backups only
2 - If possible, I need that only first backup (from the day) is full
3 - I have 7 DDS3 tape
Hi
dumpcycle should be 7 days as should the runspercycle.,
--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic Ltd
+44 (0)1865 842300
Rodrigo P. Telles wrote:
Hi Amanda Users,
This is my first post in that list.
I'm using/testing amanda by 4 weeks and now I have a doubt about
I'm configuring AMANDA to backup to a hard disk rather
than a tape drive. I followed the instructions from
Amanda Faq-O-Matic: How to configure for tapeless
operation. However, there seems to be a problem with
the way I configured the disklist file. When I try to
run amlabel, it says: amlabel:
Hi,
Is there still no way to make amanda keep dumping to the same tape and only change
over to the next tape when the first tape is full?
I've read in the FAQ why this is a good thing due to the problem with rewound tapes
etc, but when backing up to disk this would be extremely convenient...
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 09:53, Rodrigo P. Telles wrote:
Hi Amanda Users,
This is my first post in that list.
I'm using/testing amanda by 4 weeks and now I have a doubt about
confs in amanda.conf.
My scenario is:
1 - I need to do daily backups only
2 - If possible, I need that only first
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 10:13, Joseph Andorful wrote:
I'm configuring AMANDA to backup to a hard disk rather
than a tape drive. I followed the instructions from
Amanda Faq-O-Matic: How to configure for tapeless
operation. However, there seems to be a problem with
the way I configured the
Joseph Andorful said:
I'm configuring AMANDA to backup to a hard disk rather
than a tape drive. I followed the instructions from
Amanda Faq-O-Matic: How to configure for tapeless
operation. However, there seems to be a problem with
the way I configured the disklist file. When I try to
Martin, Jeremy wrote:
Hi,
Is there still no way to make amanda keep dumping to the same tape and only change over to the next tape when the first tape is full?
I've read in the FAQ why this is a good thing due to the problem with rewound tapes etc, but when backing up to disk this would be
--- Josh Welch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joseph Andorful said:
I'm configuring AMANDA to backup to a hard disk
rather
than a tape drive. I followed the instructions
from
Amanda Faq-O-Matic: How to configure for tapeless
operation. However, there seems to be a problem
with
the
Joseph Andorful wrote:
run amlabel, it says: amlabel: could not load
tapelist /etc/amanda/DailySet1/tapelist
Josh Welch wrote:
#touch /etc/amanda/DailySet1/tapelist
Josh
I performed that command as you said, but it still
didn't work. What is the configuration for the
disklist/tapelist file
like this:
20030716 Tape01 reuse
20030715 Tape05 reuse
20030714 Tape04 reuse
20030714 Tape03 reuse
20030714 Tape02 reuse
You shouldn't have to touch this beyond the initial creation
of the file. I thought I remembered reading someone saying
that they had problems if this was not a 0 byte count
Hello list
Yet another question to bug y'all with. I am consistently getting a
tar error on *one* disk entry from a host when running amverify.
Here is what I see:
Errors found:
WS1tape01 (eurasia.shcorp.com._usr.20030716.1):
amrestore: WARNING: not at start of tape, file numbers will be offset
Anders Norrbring wrote:
Have I misunderstood the whole concept here?
I thought (after searching the web) that amanda should provide a nice
and
friendly X interface, or at least a web page to do administering and job
control in?
No X interface. But of course, you can use any
Title: Nova pagina 1
CLIQUE abaixo para Download de Demonstração
Senha=123456
Listagem
dos Recursos
Controle de Estoque
¨ Contas recebidas
¨ Contas pagas
¨ Cheques depositados
¨ Controle de caixa
¨ Fluxo de caixa
¨ Mensagens internet (e-mail)
¨
26 matches
Mail list logo
