[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to back up a data base, but want to have it dump the tables
first. I thought there was a way to have amdump trigger pre/post
dump processes natively. Or, is the only way to wrap amdump in a
script of the same name, and effectively hide the real amdump program?
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 16:54, David Olbersen wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I need to back up a data base, but want to have it dump the tables
>> first. I thought there was a way to have amdump trigger pre/post
>> dump processes natively. Or, is the only way to wrap amdump in a
>> script
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 16:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I need to back up a data base, but want to have it dump the tables
>first. I thought there was a way to have amdump trigger pre/post
>dump processes natively. Or, is the only way to wrap amdump in a
>script of the same name, a
Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> David Olbersen wrote:
>
> >
> > Why not have your database program dump to a backup directory before amanda
> > comes in? If you've got the disk space this makes the most sense.
> >
> > One thing to do though: if you're going to keep history, don't name your
> > backups
David Olbersen wrote:
Why not have your database program dump to a backup directory before amanda comes in? If you've got the disk space this makes the most sense.
One thing to do though: if you're going to keep history, don't name your backups dbdump.1, dbdump.2, dbdump.3, etc. When you rotate
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:16:25PM -0600, Fran Fabrizio wrote:
>
> I have a system and I am attempting to backup a filesystem with
> approximately 30G of data. The estimates for a Level 0 take 3000
> seconds. For a level 1, 7000 seconds. Is two hours just to get an
> estimate for an incremental
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I need to back up a data base, but want to have it dump the tables
> first. I thought there was a way to have amdump trigger pre/post
> dump processes natively. Or, is the only way to wrap amdump in a
> script of the same name, and effectively hide the real amdump prog
Hi all,
I need to back up a data base, but want to have it dump the tables
first. I thought there was a way to have amdump trigger pre/post
dump processes natively. Or, is the only way to wrap amdump in a
script of the same name, and effectively hide the real amdump program?
Thanks,
--
See
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Fran Fabrizio wrote:
> I have a system and I am attempting to backup a filesystem with
> approximately 30G of data. The estimates for a Level 0 take 3000
> seconds. For a level 1, 7000 seconds. Is two hours just to get an
> estimate for an incremental dump? Is it typical
I have a system and I am attempting to backup a filesystem with
approximately 30G of data. The estimates for a Level 0 take 3000
seconds. For a level 1, 7000 seconds. Is two hours just to get an
estimate for an incremental dump? Is it typical to have to bump up the
estimate timeouts to several
yah, looks ok, I've been unable to find the package for the
libintl.so.2 though. I'm thinking it was somehow a bad build
or bad-rebuild.
The library is not (anyplace I've looked) on my first Solaris 9 box,
with the 2.4.4 (that had the spool full last night).
I'm gonna start over on this one.
th
Brian:
>From a thread on the sudo user's mailing list earlier today:
Check your environment for the amcheck and ensure that the missing library
is not in a location that depends on LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which gets cleared
when running a setUID program and the real and effective users are not the
same.
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:54:00PM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> On a completely different note - my 2.4.4 version of amanda
> installs on my other Solaris 9 system but will not run.
>
> Can't seem to resolve this library issue. Any ideas ?
>
> # /usr/local/sbin/amcheck hal
> ld.so.1: /usr/loca
err, well yes. Boy do I feel dumb. I'll have to test now.
Can I still have that on? Is there a way to configure the
proper ports? I'll ask my Mac expert.
Paul.
Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Paul Root wrote:
Nope. Same subnet
Software firewall on client?
Mitch Collinsworth
Jon,
Thanks (and happy new years).
That makes good sense - I should have realized it but I had
something else playing in the back of my mind. namely...
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
wcnotes/maildb lev 2 FAILED [no more holding disk space]
which was produced by 2.4.2p2 (rather than thi
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:23:34AM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> Hello amanda users,
>
> My report from last night has the following error(?) or does it ?
>
Forgot to ask,
what does amverifyrun tell you?
--
Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JG Computing
4455 Province Line
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:23:34AM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> Hello amanda users,
>
> My report from last night has the following error(?) or does it ?
>
>
> But the "Dumper Summary" seems to show that all is ok and I've put
> about 2x this amount of data to tape other times (LTO 220 drive
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Paul Root wrote:
> Nope. Same subnet
Software firewall on client?
> Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Paul Root wrote:
> >
> >
> >>it runs, the Mac times out waiting for a random local
> >>port.
> >
> >
> > Any firewalls involved?
> >
> > -Mitch
Nope. Same subnet
Mitch Collinsworth wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Paul Root wrote:
it runs, the Mac times out waiting for a random local
port.
Any firewalls involved?
-Mitch
--
__
Paul T. Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /_ \
600 Stinson Blvd N.E., Fl 1S /
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Paul Root wrote:
> it runs, the Mac times out waiting for a random local
> port.
Any firewalls involved?
-Mitch
Hi,
I've been running various versions
of amanda (client only) on my MacOS X (10.1-10.3)
over the last year or more. A couple weeks back it
broke without warning. I'm going to say it happened
during a System Update.
Since then I grabbed 2.4.4p1 and compiled it
up. It does the same thing.
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 09:50, Pierre-Henry DELIEGE wrote:
>Dear,
>I.m really new with Amanda and I'm trying to understand the
> tpchanger chg-zd-mtx before implementing it with a SCSI library
> containing 72 slots and 4 drives.
>I have a misunderstanding of the usage of Amanda and the tpchanger
Hello amanda users,
My report from last night has the following error(?) or does it ?
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
lyra / lev 0 FAILED [write_tapeheader: No space left on device]
FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:
/-- lyra / lev 0 FAILED [write_tapeheader: No space left on dev
Dear,
I.m really new with Amanda and I'm trying to understand the tpchanger
chg-zd-mtx before implementing it with a SCSI library containing 72 slots
and 4 drives.
I have a misunderstanding of the usage of Amanda and the tpchanger with
multiple drives. How does it work ?
In the amanda.conf file, yo
unsubscribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
unsubscribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
unsubscribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
27 matches
Mail list logo
