-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On one server I have this result after running amoverview conf :
~ date 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04
04 04
host disk 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20
client /etc
Christian Molière wrote:
On one server I have this result after running amoverview conf :
~ date 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04
04 04
host disk 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20
client /etc 0 E E 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jeroen Heijungs wrote:
Probably very stupid questions, but can someone shed some light on very simple
questions: what exactly are
the differences between the different levels of backup? I searched the documentation
and arcives but so far
I have not found the exact definitions.
Level n backup is
Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
Today, I speak to myself :
PS. CALLING ALL CARS : Are the guys working on the web frontend reading
this e-mail ?
http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Computing/AmControl
Not tested...
--
Nicolas Ecarnot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I saw this morning this result of amadmin command on
one server :
2004-04-20 client /space1/processed 0 --- 0 FAILED
(driver) [dump to tape failed]
2004-04-20 client /space1/processed 0 --- 0 FAILED
(dumper) [data
Christian Molière wrote:
I saw this morning this result of amadmin command on
one server :
2004-04-20 client /space1/processed 0 --- 0 FAILED
(driver) [dump to tape failed]
2004-04-20 client /space1/processed 0 --- 0 FAILED
(dumper) [data write: Connection
I asked about the differences between the levels of backup and I got (sofar)
two different answers (thanks to you both), so I still do not know for sure:
Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
Level n backup is a backup where you save what has changed since the
last level n backup. period.
Gertjan van Oosten
Hi Jeroen,
As quoted from Jeroen Heijungs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
what exactly are the differences between the different levels of
backup?
A level N backup includes all files modified since the last level M
backup where M N. So a level 1 backup includes all files changed
since the last level 0
Hi Jeroen,
As quoted from Jeroen Heijungs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I asked about the differences between the levels of backup and I got (sofar)
two different answers (thanks to you both), so I still do not know for sure:
My answer was paraphrased from the ufsdump documentation.
Some more
Jeroen Heijungs wrote:
I asked about the differences between the levels of backup and I got (sofar)
two different answers (thanks to you both), so I still do not know for sure:
Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
Level n backup is a backup where you save what has changed since the
last level n backup.
20040416 Dagtape-04 22 1318285 2636570 362
1 20040421 Dagtape-02 19 67215 134430 51
-
(I replayed yesterday's scenario today, so the dates are rather recent)
First question: do I get it right if I draw the conclusion that I need to
restore Dagtape-04 first
Hello Hans,
As quoted from Hans van Zijst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried a bare metal recovery yesterday,
Why didn't you just use amrecover? It prompts you to insert the right
tapes in the tape server as needed, without you having to figure it out
yourself.
Kind regards,
--
-- Gertjan van
Hi Nicolas,
As quoted from Nicolas Ecarnot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 20040402, to restore a complete system that was set up on january 1th
and crashed today, you'll have to provide :
- L0 2004
- L1 200404
- L2 20040402
Correct.
Salut,
--
-- Gertjan van Oosten, [EMAIL PROTECTED], West
Hi Gertjan,
Two reasons. First, UNIX Backup and recovery (O'Reilly) says:
amrecover should not be used to do full system recovery with vendor restore
tools [...] Full system recovery with vendor restore should be done with
amrestore.
Makes sense. And the second reason is that I want to build
compK secs
0 20040416 Dagtape-04 22 1318285 2636570 362
1 20040421 Dagtape-02 19 67215 134430 51
-
(I replayed yesterday's scenario today, so the dates are rather recent)
You didn't mention the version of amanda on the server.
It used to be (pre-2.4.3
Paul,
Every machine here runs Amanda 2.4.4p2. I'm sure the tapes that amadmin
lists, are the correct ones: Dagtape-04 was made last thursday and on
fridays I make a full dump, using another configuration. This monday and
tuesday I went on with Dagelijks.
I got exactly the same message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul,
I tried in using your code line but it doesn't
run with this error message :
syntax error at (eval 4) line 3, near },
Paul Bijnens wrote:
| Christian Molière wrote:
|
| I saw this morning this result of amadmin command on
| one server :
|
|
Christian Molière wrote:
I tried in using your code line but it doesn't
run with this error message :
syntax error at (eval 4) line 3, near },
Of course, substr should have been inside the quotes.
Like this:
map(substr(\$level{\$host}{\$disk}{'$_'},-2), sort keys %dates)) ...
Giving this block:
Hi All
I have been given a tape with useful data on. I dont know how the data is
put on the tape so cant figure out how to get to it. I have tried to use tar
to read directly from tape-device but it doesnt recognize anything.
Please enlight me with some tape-basics on how to investigate an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul,
with this line : map(substr(\\$level{\$host}{\$disk}{'$_'}\,-2),
sort keys %dates))
it runs.
Thanks for your help and your explanations.
Paul Bijnens wrote:
| Christian Molière wrote:
|
| I tried in using your code line but it doesn't
|
Mats Blomstrand wrote:
Hi All
I have been given a tape with useful data on. I dont know how the data is
put on the tape so cant figure out how to get to it. I have tried to use tar
to read directly from tape-device but it doesnt recognize anything.
Please enlight me with some tape-basics on how
Hello,
I am a new user in amanda. I got the below message after trying to execute the command amrecover with config name test :
amrecover -C test AMRECOVER Version 2.4.4p1. Contacting server on localhost ...
220 amandatux AMANDA index server (2.4.4p1) ready.
200 Access OK
Setting restore date to
Hans van Zijst wrote:
Restore can get confused when doing incremental restores from dumps that
were made on active file systems.
Of course I make backups of active file systems. If this really is the
problem, I can't imagine I'm the only one who ran into it. Or am I just the
only one who's
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 08:08, nejat onay erkose wrote:
Hello,
I am a new user in amanda. I got the below message after trying to
execute the command amrecover with config name test :
amrecover -C test AMRECOVER Version 2.4.4p1. Contacting server on
localhost ... 220 amandatux AMANDA index
Hi Paul,
Funny that you mention tar. The reason why I chose dump is that dump was
supposed to handle open files better than tar. Plus, I don't like the idea
of atime being updated because of a backup.
Anyway, I couldn't find anything about this in the changelogs of
dump/restore between my
Hello Gene,
I tried with the FQDN and it works now I have another message like the
one below. Since I am trying to to use a FILE-DRIVER to simulate tape
behaviour I have 15 pseudo-tapes. However,I didn't define any disk type
in amanda.conf; do you think that might be a problem? If it is, what
Hans van Zijst wrote:
Funny that you mention tar. The reason why I chose dump is that dump was
supposed to handle open files better than tar. Plus, I don't like the idea
of atime being updated because of a backup.
Tar and dump handle open files just as bad. Or maybe tar is a little
better in
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:03:24AM +0200, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
Level n backup is a backup where you save what has changed since the
last level n backup. period.
Minor correction: A level N backup saves all files that have changed
since the last level N-1 backup. Level 0 gets everything,
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 09:35, nejat onay erkose wrote:
Hello Gene,
Gaack! See my private post, and ignore the diatribe about the list.
I tried with the FQDN and it works now I have another message like
the one below. Since I am trying to to use a FILE-DRIVER to
simulate tape behaviour I
Hi all !!
I have this errors doing amcheck
ERROR: irixoa06.des.udc.es: [access as inspqv00 not allowed from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] open of /home/alumnos/inspqv00/.amandahosts failed
The problem is that I first installed AMANDA --with-user=inspqv00 then I
uninstalled it and reinstalled
Pablo Quinta Vidal wrote:
ERROR: irixoa06.des.udc.es: [access as inspqv00 not allowed from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] open of /home/alumnos/inspqv00/.amandahosts failed
Does this file (/home/alumnos/inspqv00/.amandahosts) exist on
irixoa06.des.udc.es? What are its permissions? Do you have a line in
it
I have a DLT VLS 80 which when backing up 10 gigs seems to run out of
tape (terminates the backup part way through with an I/O error)
I dont have any other VLS80 drives to compare against, is the drive
broken or is my ST driver not doing something right or is it a setting I
have to give amanda?
Doug,
tapedev /dev/nsa0 # the no-rewind tape device to be used
I'm not sure if this is your problem, but my amanda.conf's tapedev looks
like this:
tapedev 0 # the 0 says to look at chg-scsi.conf config 0
Your setting above might be causing amanda to not look in chg-scsi for
Hi,
First I'll inform you that I'm new to amanda. I use it only locally
for now on SuSE 9.0 with an AMD Athlon. If you need to know more,
just let my know. Now for my problem. When I first started to use
amanda I managed to make one or two backups. Then when I tried to
schedule them as cron jobs I
Great... that seems to have worked. Now I am getting the following message:
amlabel: could not load slot 0: open: /dev/ch0: Permission denied
I think I just need to be sure that the operator is in the right group.
Thanks for your help.
Doug
Doug,
tapedev /dev/nsa0 # the no-rewind
Sören Edzen wrote:
I belive I have dumper setuid root. It was one of the problems I
solved before I managed to create backups with amanda. I used the
following command:
chmod +s /usr/lib/amanda/dumper
Is this the right way to do it?
Besides dumper there are others that have to be suid root.
The
Can anyone tell me what the conditions are which cause this message to
be displayed by amcheck:
WARNING: wookie.internal.americom.com:/ does not support multiple exclude
Thanks,
Dick
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:12:16PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the conditions are which cause this message to
be displayed by amcheck:
WARNING: wookie.internal.americom.com:/ does not support multiple exclude
Same as I suggested yesterday, is wookie running an
Yes, that's a signal that amanda user doesn't have the right privs...in
my case I had to make sure amanda was in the 'disk' group since that's
the group of the tape device.
-Fran
Doug Penny wrote:
Great... that seems to have worked. Now I am getting the following message:
amlabel: could not
39 matches
Mail list logo
