Re: Amanda Over Firewall

2005-09-08 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:45:24PM -0700, Paul Vander Griend wrote: > > Hi, > > We are trying to get Amanda to work over a firewall but are > having a lot of trouble. Could anyone tell me what amanda > requires to successfuly backup over a firewall? Right now I > allow machines on the firewall

Amanda Over Firewall

2005-09-08 Thread Paul Vander Griend
Hi, We are trying to get Amanda to work over a firewall but are having a lot of trouble. Could anyone tell me what amanda requires to successfuly backup over a firewall? Right now I allow machines on the firewalled network to talk to the amanda server on port 10080. What other traffic is requi

Re: Restoring without Amanda

2005-09-08 Thread Paul Bijnens
Vytas Janusauskas wrote: [ ... ] I appreciate the fast response I got on my query from Paul ,Tony and yourself. Wow. Thanks. You're just lucky. Usually we say "yeah". ;-) -- Paul Bijnens, XplanationTel +32 16 397.511 Technologielaan 21 bus 2, B-3001 Leu

Re: Amanda unable to use amrecover ssince dumptype change for a New Monthly back up as well as Daily.

2005-09-08 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:55:05PM +0100, Chuck Amadi Systems Administrator wrote: > Hi again > > I have run the following : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/ # amrecover DailySet1 -s myserver.smtl.co.uk -t > myserver.smtl.co.uk > AMRECOVER Version 2.4.4p2. Contacting server on nemesis.smtl.co.uk ... > 22

Re: Restoring without Amanda

2005-09-08 Thread Vytas Janusauskas
At 02:13 PM 9/7/05, you wrote: On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:32:47AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: snip ... Vytas, Tony, Would the header message have been any clearer if it said dd if= bs=32k skip=1 | /bin/gzip -dc | bin/tar -...f - or maybe dd if= bs=32k skip=1 | /bin/gzip -dc |

Re: Restoring without Amanda

2005-09-08 Thread Paul Bijnens
Tony van der Hoff wrote: I posted last week that my confusion had arisen out of the "skip=1", having located the required archive. The need to rewind and skip 2 files in this case could have been avoided at step 1 above. Now *that* would make a difference. Ah, there is the confusion! The "ski

Re: Backing up from LVM targets

2005-09-08 Thread Paul Bijnens
Fran Fabrizio wrote: I've got my first LVM-based system to be backed up and I'm running into permission problems. The client system is Fedora Core 4. I've installed amanda there by 'yum install'ing the amanda and amanda-client packages. I've enabled amanda in xinetd and reloaded xinetd. I

Re: planner timeouts

2005-09-08 Thread Paul Bijnens
Charles Sprickman wrote: On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Paul Bijnens wrote: http://bway.net/~spork/amanda-tcpdump.txt You'll note that the "frags" thing is still set, but if you compare what the server sent to what the client received, it is identical. I believe you have a UDP fragementation network p