On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:35:53PM -0700, Broderick Wood enlightened us:
> My resistance comes from the fact that we have been using AMANDA for about
> 2 years whereas we have had a user called "amanda" for about 15 years...
>
> I also don't want to do a source build as we are maintaining about 5
My resistance comes from the fact that we have been using AMANDA for about 2
years whereas we have had a user called "amanda" for about 15 years...
I also don't want to do a source build as we are maintaining about 500+
machines in varying state of OS version/patch/etc...
We use CfEngine to p
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:35:16PM -0500, Gene Heskett enlightened us:
> Jeff: How do the rpms handle the perms? When building from tarballs,
> we always do the configuration & building as the user amanda, and then
> become root to do the install so the perms are always handled
> correctly. Root
On Monday 28 November 2005 10:58, Jay Fenlason wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 08:48:09PM -0700, Broderick Wood wrote:
>> Is there anyone out there who is using the RedHat RPMs abut has to
>> change the user that runs the backups?
>>
>> ie. I want to change the name from "amanda" to "backup" or so
Correcting my own reply:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:41:41AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:22:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > and amreport seems to require an MTA.
>
> You didn't read the man page closely enough. It will generate a file
> containing a PostScr
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 08:48:09PM -0700, Broderick Wood wrote:
> Is there anyone out there who is using the RedHat RPMs abut has to change
> the user that runs the backups?
>
> ie. I want to change the name from "amanda" to "backup" or some other ID
> but runtar seems to have the id "amanda" h
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:16:55AM -0400, Josh Sholes wrote:
> My organization is considering upgrading from a pair of ancient DLT8000
> standalone drives to a library system. We'd love to use Amanda, but I can't
> find any documentation on whether or not the Quantum PX206 or M2500 (our
> front
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:22:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-27 19:08]:
> >
> > Did the "mailto" target get a report from amdump?
>
> Probably not.. I'm not running a local mail server, and it was set to
> send to a local user "amanda". There ar
My organization is considering upgrading from a pair of ancient DLT8000
standalone drives to a library system. We'd love to use Amanda, but I can't
find any documentation on whether or not the Quantum PX206 or M2500 (our
frontrunner candidates for the new system) are compatible with Amanda.
A
On Monday 28 November 2005 05:45, Rodrigo Ventura wrote:
>This just happened this night amdump:
>
>(/tmp/amanda/sendbackup.20051128003448.debug)
>[...]
>sendbackup: time 3.133: index created successfully
>sendbackup: time 3.134: error [/bin/tar got signal 11]
>sendbackup: time 3.134: pid 13222 fini
Rodrigo Ventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This just happened this night amdump:
>
> (/tmp/amanda/sendbackup.20051128003448.debug)
> [...]
> sendbackup: time 3.133: index created successfully
> sendbackup: time 3.134: error [/bin/tar got signal 11]
> sendbackup: time 3.134: pid 13222 finish tim
This just happened this night amdump:
(/tmp/amanda/sendbackup.20051128003448.debug)
[...]
sendbackup: time 3.133: index created successfully
sendbackup: time 3.134: error [/bin/tar got signal 11]
sendbackup: time 3.134: pid 13222 finish time Mon Nov 28 00:34:51 2005
Signal 11 is SIGSEGV. My tar
12 matches
Mail list logo