r:
A. 20060216
B. 20060223
C. 20060302
Select directories to flush [A..C]: [ALL] B C
Today is: 20060303
Flushing dumps in 20060223, 20060302 to tape drive "/dev/nst0".
Expecting tape TLS-Set-1-05 or a new tape. (The last dumps were to
tape TLS-Set
-1-04)
Are you sure you want to do
Anthony,
On Thursday 02 March 2006 21:30, Anthony Valentine wrote:
> When I run amverify, I get errors at the beginning and the end of the
> status mail, however it shows the complete tape listing in the middle.
> Here it the output, edited for length (let me know if you want to see
> the entire o
If you make the directory to be backed up visible to the backup server
over samba, it should be as simple as adding that directories to you
DLE's. Assuming of course that you have media that has space to handle
the added entry. Making sure the Windows server dir is visible with the
right permis
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:07:23AM -0600, gil naveh wrote:
>
> Recently I was requested to use Amanda to backup some of our Window server.
>
> In order to do so, I have to configure Amanda with Smbclient.
>
> Does it mean that I have do - reconfigure + make + make install from start -
> or is th
On Friday 03 March 2006 11:07, gil naveh wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>We have Amanda backing up our Solaris servers for about a year. So far
> we are very happy with Amanda.
>
>Recently I was requested to use Amanda to backup some of our Window
> server.
>
>In order to do so, I have to configure Amanda with
t; 20060223: found Amanda directory.
>> 20060302: found Amanda directory.
>>
>> Multiple Amanda directories, please pick one by letter:
>> A. 20060216
>> B. 20060223
>> C. 20060302
>> Select directories to flush [A..C]: [ALL] B C
>>
&g
Hi,
We have Amanda backing up our Solaris servers for about a year. So far
we are very happy with Amanda.
Recently I was requested to use Amanda to backup some of our Window
server.
In order to do so, I have to configure Amanda with Smbclient.
Does it mean that I have do – reconfigur
Yes, apart from loading "ip_conntrack_amanda" module I also have next
rule on the iptables config:
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywherestate
RELATED,ESTABLISHED
So I don't know if this is a specific issue of the Scientific Linux
distribution, Is anybody using amanda clien
On Friday 03 March 2006 04:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> That sounds actually good to me...
> - disk capacity is increasing a lot,
> - disk transfer speeds are also increasing, but less compared to
> capacity, - disk latency (seek times) is improving very slowly.
All of this is true, but the
ectory.
>
> Multiple Amanda directories, please pick one by letter:
> A. 20060216
> B. 20060223
> C. 20060302
> Select directories to flush [A..C]: [ALL] B C
>
> Today is: 20060303
> Flushing dumps in 20060223, 20060302 to tape drive "/dev/nst0".
> Expect
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:39:50PM +0100, Jorge Izquierdo (UAM) enlightened us:
> We use Scientific Linux 4.2 with kernel 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL and also with
> Scientific Linux 4.0 2.6.9-5.0.5.EL the same problem
>
Not sure what to tell you then, these kernels all worked on my CentOS boxes.
You are all
We use Scientific Linux 4.2 with kernel 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL and also with
Scientific Linux 4.0 2.6.9-5.0.5.EL the same problem
Jorge
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 13:15, Matt Hyclak wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:04:11PM +0100, Jorge Izquierdo (UAM) enlightened
> us:
> > We are using amanda software to
al 16
drwxrwxrwx2 amanda disk 4096 Feb 16 03:32 20060216
drwxrwxrwx2 amanda disk 4096 Feb 23 04:40 20060223
drwx--2 amanda disk 4096 Mar 2 05:24 20060302
drwx--2 amanda disk 4096 Mar 3 10:55 20060303
./20060216:
total 3466424
-rwxrwxrwx
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 01:04:11PM +0100, Jorge Izquierdo (UAM) enlightened us:
> We are using amanda software to backup our servers and workstations
> onour department and we have a problem with the iptables configurations
> ofsome of the amanda clients.
>
> The problem is with the stations with
Hi everybody!
We are using amanda software to backup our servers and workstations
onour department and we have a problem with the iptables configurations
ofsome of the amanda clients.
The problem is with the stations with Linux with kernel version
2.6. Using the same configuration as in Linux wit
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Ian Turner wrote:
> On Thursday 02 March 2006 12:31, you wrote:
> > Does UDF support a modern permissions system though? I thought it
> > didn't, because it was designed for optical media...
>
> Yes. It is designed to be a superset of all common filesystems, feature-wise.
> So
16 matches
Mail list logo
