use /dev/nst instead. /dev/st rewinds when you close.
--On March 29, 2006 10:52:57 PM -0500 stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to bootstrap replacing a failed Amanda machine.
I've built the new machine, and moslty got it working.
So, it's time to get the config files, and maybe indexe
> See if the info here is applicable:
> http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Amdump:_mesg_read:_Connection_reset_by_peer
works fine now! Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 29.03.2006
09:11:07:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:54:14AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm having troubles aft
> So, it's time to get the config files, and maybe indexes
> off of the tapes from the faile machine.
And eventually, like it was suggested some time ago (from a web page
that I was directed to for some otherproblem);
you should double back-up the indexes, so you can put up a new
Amanda
> What am I doing wrong?
# mt -f /dev/nst1 fsf 1
^^^
use nst1 for the no rewind device instead. Esle the tape is rewinded
at the end of each operation.
Olivier
I'm trying to bootstrap replacing a failed Amanda machine.
I've built the new machine, and moslty got it working.
So, it's time to get the config files, and maybe indexes
off of the tapes from the faile machine.
I looked in the docs, and this should be simple. But:
Script started on Thu Mar 30
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 05:46:16PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:37:22PM -0500, stan wrote:
> >
> > I'm still struggling with bandwidth limits on a new installation. I cna't
> > seem to get they new server to come anywhere close to using the bandwidth
> > I've told it to u
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:37:22PM -0500, stan wrote:
>
> I'm still struggling with bandwidth limits on a new installation. I cna't
> seem to get they new server to come anywhere close to using the bandwidth
> I've told it to use, and amstatus still says it has spare dumpers because
> it's bandwid
stan schreef:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:53:26PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
On 2006-03-29 14:58, stan wrote:
I'm setting up a new system using RAIT with one vtape, and one physical
tape in each RAIT set. I only have room on my disks for 5 vtapes, but I
have 25 tapes. I would like to just have t
stan schreef:
I'm still struggling with bandwidth limits on a new installation. I cna't
seem to get they new server to come anywhere close to using the bandwidth
I've told it to use, and amstatus still says it has spare dumpers because
it's bandwidth limited.
Is there some good documentation a
I'm still struggling with bandwidth limits on a new installation. I cna't
seem to get they new server to come anywhere close to using the bandwidth
I've told it to use, and amstatus still says it has spare dumpers because
it's bandwidth limited.
Is there some good documentation as to how this fe
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:53:26PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> On 2006-03-29 14:58, stan wrote:
> >I'm setting up a new system using RAIT with one vtape, and one physical
> >tape in each RAIT set. I only have room on my disks for 5 vtapes, but I
> >have 25 tapes. I would like to just have the last
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:57:18PM +0100, Anthony Worrall wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have just done exactly this. I setup the RAUT as a chg-multi with 5
> slots
> I then ran a little script to copy the tape label before running amdump
> I also setup two other configs one for just using the tape which is
Richard,
I commited the patch to cvs.
Thanks.
Jean-Louis
Richard Burridge wrote:
Jean-Louis,
The patch seems to have done the trick and Amanda has now compiled :)
P.S. Gcc version was 2.96
Thanks a lot
Rich.
From: Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:54:
Hi
We have just done exactly this. I setup the rait as a chg-multi with 5
slots
I then ran a little script to copy the tape label before running amdump
I also setup two other configs one for just using the tape which is used
by amcheck and on which just uses the vtapes so we can recover files
with
On 2006-03-29 14:58, stan wrote:
I'm setting up a new system using RAIT with one vtape, and one physical
tape in each RAIT set. I only have room on my disks for 5 vtapes, but I
have 25 tapes. I would like to just have the last 5 backup sets (one week)
on the vtapes at any one time, but rotate thr
Jean-Louis,
The patch seems to have done the trick and Amanda has now compiled :)
P.S. Gcc version was 2.96
Thanks a lot
Rich.
> From: Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:54:17 -0500
> To: Richard Burridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: amanda-users
> Subject: Re:
I'm setting up a new system using RAIT with one vtape, and one physical
tape in each RAIT set. I only have room on my disks for 5 vtapes, but I
have 25 tapes. I would like to just have the last 5 backup sets (one week)
on the vtapes at any one time, but rotate through all 25 physical tapes.
Can I
Richard,
Which gcc are you using?
Could you try the attached patch?
We use a construct thjat is not valid for all compiler.
Jean-Louis
Richard Burridge wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from 2.4.2 (which is running perfectly), but
having trouble compiling the new 2.5.0 release and got an err
Title: Problem compiling 2.5.0
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from 2.4.2 (which is running perfectly), but having trouble compiling the new 2.5.0 release and got an error during the make:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../config -I../common-src -I../common-src -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
19 matches
Mail list logo
