/tmp/amanda needs 64KB, only has -2147483648KB available

Hello all, When I run amcheck, I've got this result : ERROR: services4.obs-besancon.fr: [dir /tmp/amanda needs 64KB, only has -2147483648KB available.] ERROR: services4.obs-besancon.fr: [dir /var/log/amanda needs 64KB, only has -2147483648KB available.] ERROR: services4.obs-besancon.fr: [dir

Re: /tmp/amanda needs 64KB, only has -2147483648KB available

* Rémi Demarthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:06:15:15:07:51+0200] scribed: Hello all, When I run amcheck, I've got this result : ERROR: services4.obs-besancon.fr: [dir /tmp/amanda needs 64KB, only has -2147483648KB available.] ERROR: services4.obs-besancon.fr: [dir /var/log/amanda needs 64KB,

Recommended value for bumppercent?

Another question related to one of my recent threads: What do you think is a good value for bumppercent? Why? - Toralf

RE: Timeout problem

-Original Message- I have a very weird problem with my amanda system, that maybe others may be able to help. Here's my issue: I have a server and two clients. The server and one client are RedHat 9, while the other client is RHEL 4. The problem I'm having is with the two RH9

determining backup set

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I'm new to amanda. If I have a collection of tapes from previous amanda backups, is there a procedure for determining which set of tapes contain a complete backup? Thank you. -- Marlin Whitaker

Re: samba backups and -N option

On 6/14/06, Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only recently noticed the -N option to smbtar (-TN for smbclient). This allows backups based on a file's timestamp being newer than a control file. Using the archive bit, as is now done, has several problems. For example, other apps might

Re: samba backups and -N option

On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 11:37:52AM -0700, Paddy Sreenivasan wrote: On 6/14/06, Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only recently noticed the -N option to smbtar (-TN for smbclient). This allows backups based on a file's timestamp being newer than a control file. Using the archive bit,

Re: determining backup set

On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:33:16PM -0400, Marlin Whitaker wrote: Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I'm new to amanda. If I have a collection of tapes from previous amanda backups, is there a procedure for determining which set of tapes contain a complete backup? I'm assuming you don't

Re: samba backups and -N option

Paddy Sreenivasan schreef: On 6/14/06, Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only recently noticed the -N option to smbtar (-TN for smbclient). This allows backups based on a file's timestamp being newer than a control file. Using the archive bit, as is now done, has several problems. For

Amanda Birds of a Feather session at LinuxWorld in San Francisco in August

Hi there, If you plan attending upcoming LinuxWorld in San Francisco on August 14-17 or if you live in SF/Bay area, please stop by at Amanda Birds-of-a-Feather meeting. The Amanda sessions we had at LinuxWorld in Boston and at MySQL user conference provided an excellent opportunity to meet

Re: samba backups and -N option

In my testing it seemed the file could be on the direct client, not the indirect PC. But I must admit I was only doing it from the command line. For that I was creating (touch -t ...) the control file on the linux box then smbtar'ing from a windows host. This would mean the samba user

Re: samba backups and -N option

Paul Bijnens wrote: Paddy Sreenivasan schreef: On 6/14/06, Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I only recently noticed the -N option to smbtar (-TN for smbclient). This allows backups based on a file's timestamp being newer than a control file. Using the archive bit, as is now done, has