> I recently upgraded the first of our Amanda installations to 2.5.0p2
> ] and found an unwelcome surprise: amcheck no longer reports tape
> problems via e-mail from an amcheck run out of the Amanda user's
> crontab file.
I understood that was one of the changes in the new version.
Since I starte
an error about
> the wrong tape loaded in the drive, but again I get nothing from
>
> amcheck -sm.
> read label `emcpd-006', date `20060711'
> (expecting tape emcpd-007 or a new tape)
>
> Is there some change or magic s
Hi,
Please help me out in this problem.
I seen the socket connection between the chunker and
amandad. What is purpose of the socket?
Actually I understood that backup data send by the
amandad(client) and received by the
dumper(server)through the data port. Is it true?
How the dumper will s
Amanda Group
I ran the amtapetype from Amanda 2.5.0p2 last night, took about 6 hours to
complete the estimate:
Model: Quantum Superload 3 LTO-3 16 Tape Library.
define tapetype QS3LTO-3 {
comment "Quantum Super Loader 3 LTO-3 16 tape library"
length 448369 mbytes
filemark 6403 kbytes
speed 3
* Jon LaBadie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006:07:11:11:59:30-0400] scribed:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Nathan Weston wrote:
> > As for the second problem, I don't see anything in the .debug files that
> > gives me a clue. The permissions for /etc/amandates look like this:
> > -rw-r---
Hi,
I am planning to develop the GUI for Amanda using Java
swings. I have two options . Please suggest me which
one is best.
1.Develop the new application for java and invoke the
planner and driver executable.Amanda code need not be
touched.
2.Convert the entire server code to Java and adding
th
error
(expecting tape emcpd-007 or a new tape)
If I have the old tape loaded in the drive, I get an error about
the wrong tape loaded in the drive, but again I get nothing from
amcheck -sm.
read label `emcpd-006', date
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:08:27PM -0400, Nathan Weston wrote:
>
> But, I seem to have found the source of the problem -- I'm running
> Fedora Core 4 which has SELinux enabled by default. When I turn that
> off, amcheck runs with no errors.
>
> Is there an easy way to make amanda play nice with
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:08:27PM -0400, Nathan Weston enlightened us:
> Matt Hyclak wrote:
> >
> >Yes, you need to create an /etc/amandapass file with the appropriate
> >username/password combinations. man amanda for the details.
> >
> >>As for the second problem, I don't see anything in the .deb
Matt Hyclak wrote:
Yes, you need to create an /etc/amandapass file with the appropriate
username/password combinations. man amanda for the details.
As for the second problem, I don't see anything in the .debug files that
gives me a clue. The permissions for /etc/amandates look like this:
-rw-
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:46:12AM -0700, Pavel Pragin wrote:
> Example configuration (all of the files below need to be owned by user
> "amanda"):
>
> The AMANDA client software and Samba is installed on host
> "amanda_server_host". A share to be backed up called "share" is on PC
> "my-laptop"
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Nathan Weston wrote:
> I'm a first-time amanda user, trying to backup a linux machine and a few
> windows shares. I went through the tutorial at
> amanda.zmanda.com/quick-backup-setup.html, modifying things to fit my
> setup. The linux machine seems to b
Example configuration (all of the files below need to be owned by user
"amanda"):
The AMANDA client software and Samba is installed on host
"amanda_server_host". A share to be backed up called "share" is on PC
"my-laptop". The share will be accessed via PC user "testing" and
password "testing
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Nathan Weston enlightened us:
> I'm a first-time amanda user, trying to backup a linux machine and a few
> windows shares. I went through the tutorial at
> amanda.zmanda.com/quick-backup-setup.html, modifying things to fit my
> setup. The linux machine s
I'm a first-time amanda user, trying to backup a linux machine and a few
windows shares. I went through the tutorial at
amanda.zmanda.com/quick-backup-setup.html, modifying things to fit my
setup. The linux machine seems to be ok, but I'm getting some errors
with the SMB share.
The windows ma
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:14:19AM -0600, Graeme Humphries wrote:
> Nicola Mauri wrote:
> > 1) What kind of errors can amverify detect?
> > 2) What kind of errors *cannot* amverify detect?
> > 3) Does it make sense to schedule amverify after amdump every day?
> > 4) Should we trust amverify results
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:07:32PM +0930, Jerlique Bahn wrote:
>
> > Yes, it will do a read of the entire tape. There is a config file option
> > called amrecover_do_fsf that if set to true will fsf your tape to the
> > correct spot if your drive supports it, which is much faster than a linear
>
Nicola Mauri wrote:
1) What kind of errors
can amverify
detect?
2) What kind of errors *cannot*
amverify
detect?
3) Does it make sense to schedule
amverify
after amdump every day?
4) Should we trust amverify results?
Should we continue to check backup by periodically restoring so
I would like to use amverify to make
sure that data written to tape is also readable.
Could anybody clarify the following
issues:
1) What kind of errors can amverify
detect?
2) What kind of errors *cannot* amverify
detect?
3) Does it make sense to schedule amverify
after amdump every day?
4) Sho
On 2006-07-11 14:13, Jerlique Bahn wrote:
Just a thought: Were you sitting next to the tape drive while running the
above test? Did you see it stopping and re-starting over and over...?
Yes it is starting and stopping at frequent intervals. I recompiled amanda
with --with-buffered-dump to try
Hello,
> > Ok, I have increased tapebufs to 80, I'm not really sure how high to
> > increase it though. I do have plenty of free ram.
>
> >I've increased it to 1024 on my PowerEdge 2850 with 8GB RAM.
Ok wow that's a huge increase. I'll keep trying smaller increments until I
get the error and t
> > Contention on the disk, especially if it is also
used for other
> > tasks, and compounded if inparallel is set very high. RAID5
is often
> > not high-performance. I've seen some that do well on a
single read
> > or write, but seriously degrade with a few simultaneous operations.
> >
> Yes, it will do a read of the entire tape. There is a config file option
> called amrecover_do_fsf that if set to true will fsf your tape to the
> correct spot if your drive supports it, which is much faster than a linear
> read.
I do have that set, and the drive finished up in about 1 hour.
Hi,
Please clarify the TCP socket connection between the
dumper and amandad. Let me know which one is acting as
a server and client. If we specify the entry in the
DLE like this 222.222.222.222 /home root-tar.
chunker: stream_accept: connection from
127.0.0.1.45601
dumper: stream_client: connecte
Hi,
Please clarify the TCP socket connection between the
dumper and amandad. Let me know which one is acting as
a server and client. If we specify the entry in the
DLE like this 222.222.222.222 /home root-tar.
chunker: stream_accept: connection from
127.0.0.1.45601
dumper: stream_client: connecte
25 matches
Mail list logo