Finally I'm getting back on track after the tar 1.15.91-2 incremental changes.
Due to this issue and my yearly holidays, my backups are long overdue and
Amanda likes to do lots of level 0s (as expected).
I just noticed this in the mail log of last night's backup:
| /-- anakin / lev 0 FAILED
Hi all,
Can any one please help me out in this regard.
Ihave taken backup using amanda on a virtual tape library.
How to restore the contents back.
If i check the file type it is showing as character Computer Graphics Metafile.
Thanks in advance
kamalesh
Please visit http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Restoring_files Thanks,Sachin.On 7/31/06,
kamalesh krishna murthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Can any one please help me out in this regard.
Ihave taken backup using amanda on a virtual tape library.
How to restore the contents back.
If i check
Hi,
I'd appreciate some advice on what is regarded as the correct usage of
amflush and the tapes to use with amflush.
If the need to run amflush occurs, then amanda tells you which tape to use
next, or that you can use a new tape.
My question is simply this: Is it acceptable to use the next
Aha - thanks for that!
That was kind of what I was wondering about - didn't realise that amanda
will add it to the rotation, so I thought what happens to the tape then...
I wonder - how will amanda handle labelling the new tape, then? Will you be
asked to label it first, manually, or does
Guys
I'm have _real_ trouble trying to force Amanda to do a L0 backup of the
system that was effected by Amanda wiping out the last L0.
I've tried to force a L0 backup of it, like :
amadmin DailySet1 force qtvpdc.lab:/Shares
amadmin: qtvpdc.lab:/Shares is set to a forced level 0 at next run.
The little bit of experience I have of amanda has showed me that dumpcycle
0 in amanda.conf will force a level 0 (full) dump. I've been running
amanda in a test lab with that setting before going production with
incremental backups.
Probably not the correct way of doing it in your case, but
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:37:58AM -0700, Joe Donner (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
Aha - thanks for that!
That was kind of what I was wondering about - didn't realise that amanda
will add it to the rotation, so I thought what happens to the tape then...
I wonder - how will amanda handle
bis 15.8. bin ich nicht erreichbar. in dringenden fällen senden sie ihre
nachricht bitte an mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], vielen dank.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:52:10AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Finally I'm getting back on track after the tar 1.15.91-2 incremental changes.
Due to this issue and my yearly holidays, my backups are long overdue and
Amanda likes to do lots of level 0s (as expected).
I just noticed
Amanda version: 2.5.0
Linux: Fedora Core 4
Windows Amanda client: Downloaded from
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/amanda-win32/amanda-clients-2.5.0-2001062
8.zip?use_mirror=nchc and installed it on the Windows platform. The amandad
service is successfully starting by running the
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:52:10AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Finally I'm getting back on track after the tar 1.15.91-2 incremental
changes.
Due to this issue and my yearly holidays, my backups are long overdue and
Amanda likes to do lots
After the struggle to burn my tape-split backups onto DVD, I find myself
wondering just how useful they are. The current set of backups are still on
hard drive, but what if I want to find an earlier copy of a file which has
since been burned onto DVD?
It seems to me that once vtapes are free
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:14:29PM +0530, joseph wrote:
Amanda version: 2.5.0
Linux: Fedora Core 4
Windows Amanda client: Downloaded from
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/amanda-win32/amanda-clients-2.5.0-2001062
8.zip?use_mirror=nchc and installed it on the Windows platform. The
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 02:04:54PM +0100, Alan Pearson wrote:
Guys
I'm have _real_ trouble trying to force Amanda to do a L0 backup of the
system that was effected by Amanda wiping out the last L0.
I've tried to force a L0 backup of it, like :
amadmin DailySet1 force qtvpdc.lab:/Shares
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:56:22PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
After the struggle to burn my tape-split backups onto DVD, I find myself
wondering just how useful they are. The current set of backups are still on
hard drive, but what if I want to find an earlier copy of a file which has
since
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:56:22PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
It seems to me that once vtapes are free for overwriting the corresponding
index will be lost too. Can either amrestore or amrecover actually access
these files?
Barring defects in the file/media, amrestore can *always* be used to
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Alan Pearson wrote:
I've tried to force a L0 backup of it, like :
amadmin DailySet1 force qtvpdc.lab:/Shares
amadmin: qtvpdc.lab:/Shares is set to a forced level 0 at next run.
But when amdump runs, it just schedules a L1 or L2 backup.
Syntax:
% amadmin help
Usage:
: 640.0%,640.0%,640.0%
Incremental: 640.0%,640.0%,640.0%
Dumps: lev datestmp tape file origK compK secs
0 20060727 vtape1495 10 641
1 20060731 vtape18 121 10 641
--
Jon H. LaBadie
On Monday 31 July 2006 13:24, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 09:52:10AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
[...]
Looks like tar 1.15.92 is seriously broken...
Bummer, it's even a known issue:
On Monday 31 July 2006 13:56, Anne Wilson wrote:
After the struggle to burn my tape-split backups onto DVD, I find myself
wondering just how useful they are. The current set of backups are still
on hard drive, but what if I want to find an earlier copy of a file
which has since been burned onto
Ooops
Sorry that's what I typed, cut and paste was a bit off as I tried to
remove the company name from the host !
Finally got a L0 pumped to tape, after several runs (other errors were
involved such as exclude list wrong)
many thanks everyone.
--
AlanP
On Mon, July 31, 2006 8:24 pm, Mitch
On Monday 31 July 2006 19:45, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:56:22PM +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
After the struggle to burn my tape-split backups onto DVD, I find myself
wondering just how useful they are. The current set of backups are still
on hard drive, but what if I want
2.5.1b2 RPMs and source tar ball are available for following platforms at
http://www.zmanda.com/downloads.html
- Red Hat Enterprise server 4,
- Red Hat Enterprise server 3
- Suse Linux Enterprise 9,
- Suse Linux Enterprise 10,
- Open Suse 10.0,
- Fedora Core 3,
- Fedora Core 4,
- Fedora Core 5
Is there a requirement that we need to run Cygwin mandatorily on the
Windows
client for getting this up and running?
I am not user of the windows client.
But are you sure Amanda is fully operational on the Linux machine
first?
- what amcheck -s config is saying?
- what is you have a DLE
25 matches
Mail list logo
