Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> I'm using 1.16 (from Debian) since a while. Seems to work fine (no
> restore done so far, though ;-)
>
1.16 works fine with the newer 2.5.x releases of Amanda (I've been
using it for a while on my home network), but if you use it on a
2.4.5 system the estimates will fail
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:07:32PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:10:02PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> > >
> > > Jon,
> > >
> > > Think I found a good kit for 1.15.1, which seems to be on the
> > > "good" list at amanda.org.
>
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:07:32PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:10:02PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> >
> > Jon,
> >
> > Think I found a good kit for 1.15.1, which seems to be on the
> > "good" list at amanda.org.
> >
> > Unless you advise otherwise I will try to bui
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:10:02PM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
> Think I found a good kit for 1.15.1, which seems to be on the
> "good" list at amanda.org.
>
> Unless you advise otherwise I will try to build using that version.
>
It looks like 1.15.1 compiled easily on my Solaris 9
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Hello,
Several people have expressed an interest in helping to test and/or support
the environments in which they are knowledgeable. After discussion with some
other developers and Zmanda folks, We would like to formalize this process a
bit.
Jon,
Think I found a good kit for 1.15.1, which seems to be on the
"good" list at amanda.org.
Unless you advise otherwise I will try to build using that version.
thank you,
Brian
On Tue, May 22, 20
Jon,
Oddly I can't seem to find the source (no way to keep a repository
of related software at amanda.org ?).
I received a suggestion that blastwave.org might even have a
precompiled binary, but I can only find the current (?) version
of 1.15.91 there. Perhaps I'm overlooking as section of that
Hello,
There has been much recent discussion in amanda-hackers, and -users
about testing and support for the wide variety of platforms and
architectures on which Amanda runs, and the wide variety of
configurations in which folks use it. Amanda's ability to compile and
run on a wide variety o
Brian Cuttler wrote:
When I tried a restore yesterday I found that the files I brought
back had a long numeric number preceeding the original path. I will
try a restore again when the current amdump run completes to see if
this is still the case. Is this normal, or perhaps an artifact of
not hav
index are always compressed on the server with --best.
Why do you think your data is compressed?
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Good morning amanda users,
I'm running amanda 2.4.4 on solaris 9, just built it on solaris 8.
Finding that my TAR dumptypes seem to be running compression though
I
ONT_FILE 20070522 wcnotes /maildb2/five lev 0 comp N program /usr/local
/bin/gtar
To restore, position tape at start of file and run:
dd if= bs=32k skip=1 | /usr/local/bin/gtar -f... -
When I tried a restore yesterday I found that the files I brought
back had a long numeric number precee
Ian Turner wrote:
> On Monday 21 May 2007 13:54, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
>
>> Jordan Desroches wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to figure out how to set backup retention, and was
>>> wondering if it was as simple as making sure the number of tapes a
>>> configuration has to use allows it to cycle
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:29:12AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
>
> I want to thank you for your help. I did find an older version of
> gtar - that I believe to be working. Its a 1.13 but I don't see a
> more specific version number (from SFW collection). I will replace
> as suggested if I have any
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:21:50AM -0400, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> Good morning amanda users,
>
> I'm running amanda 2.4.4 on solaris 9, just built it on solaris 8.
>
> Finding that my TAR dumptypes seem to be running compression though
> I believe I've configured it not to.
>
> The (ufs)DUMP DLEs
Good morning amanda users,
I'm running amanda 2.4.4 on solaris 9, just built it on solaris 8.
Finding that my TAR dumptypes seem to be running compression though
I believe I've configured it not to.
The (ufs)DUMP DLEs properly perform "compression none".
Not only that, but the default, I believ
Robert McCraw,
Dustin Mitcher,
Christopher McCrory,
Peter Kunst,
Amanda users,
I want to thank you for your help. I did find an older version of
gtar - that I believe to be working. Its a 1.13 but I don't see a
more specific version number (from SFW collection). I will replace
as suggested if I h
Thanks Dustin,
With tar 1.15 incremental backups are working again.
regards :-)
BruceS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce S. Skinner) writes:
> Right on. GNU tar version is 1.15.91 and
> /var/log/amanda/sendsize.blahblah has the following errors:
>
> sendsize[16402]: argument list: /bin/tar --create -
17 matches
Mail list logo
