This is great news for April Fool's Day!
On Apr 1, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Hello,
The Amanda core team is pleased to announce the release of Amanda 6.2.
snip
Here's a list of the changes for release 6.2 (from the NEWS file):
Look at the ReleaseNotes and ChangeLog
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 2 Apr at 9:47 Theodotos Andreou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to tell a Backup job not to start if there is no correct
label found on the changer? I do not want to use amflush later because
/amandadumps is too small to host
On 2 Apr at 9:47 Theodotos Andreou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to tell a Backup job not to start if there is no correct
label found on the changer? I do not want to use amflush later because
/amandadumps is too small to host all level 0 images during a
Theodotos Andreou wrote:
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 2 Apr at 9:47 Theodotos Andreou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to tell a Backup job not to start if there is no correct
label found on the changer? I do not want to use amflush later because
Hello,
from some time now amanda has refused to send me mails. According to
amdump.1 this is what happens:
amdump: end at Wed Apr 2 01:57:12 WEST 2008
Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character
. . . message not sent.
/data/amanda/dead.letter 324/19378
amreport: mail command failed:
Okay, so I was had :-) Not the first time, won't be the last...
I didn't even notice the 6.2 on the announcement. I read it as 2.6.
Guess I'm turning dyslexic in my old age?
Given that, my questions about the flush settings still stands for
2.6. Any thoughts?
Thanks much,
Bruce.
On
Sorry for the multiple recent posts but as I work my way through enabling
encrypted backups I keep running into different issues. In our last episode, I
had enabled encrypted backups and corrected an issue with ipv6 and key placement
on the amanda server.
My current issue is that while backups
Hello,
I've changed the Subject: line for this thread so not to bother
people...
This is just to relate my first hand-on experience with 2.6.0.
I am a happy camper. See below.
* Dustin J. Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080401 18:17]:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin
[EMAIL
Am 01.04.08 22:35 schrieb(en) Jean-Francois Malouin:
dpkg reports 2.12.4 installed:
ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-2 The GLib library of C routines
Doesn't Debian/Ubuntu have the devel libs and headers in the
libglib2.0-dev package?
Cheers, Albrecht.
pgpOfUzZQAsk2.pgp
Description: PGP
* Albrecht DreÃ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080402 15:26]:
Am 01.04.08 22:35 schrieb(en) Jean-Francois Malouin:
dpkg reports 2.12.4 installed:
ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.4-2 The GLib library of C routines
Doesn't Debian/Ubuntu have the devel libs and headers in the
libglib2.0-dev package
I'm having some strange issues as well, trying to do encrypted backups on
FreeBSD. Let me ask this:
1. Is encrypted storage of backups a production feature?
2. What documentation is available giving technical details on encrypted
backups using amanda?
What would really help is a
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Nomad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having some strange issues as well, trying to do encrypted backups on
FreeBSD. Let me ask this:
1. Is encrypted storage of backups a production feature?
Yes. We have done limited testing on FreeBSD as well as encryption
12 matches
Mail list logo
