Thank You for the info
I entered:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/> /usr/local/sbin/amdump fullback -o
tapetype:LTO4:blocksize=2048
results:
argument "": an integer is expected
argument "": Tape blocksize must be at least 32 KBytes
** (process:17472): CRITICAL **: parse error in configuration overwrites
wher
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Doyle Collings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to manually define the tapetype from the command line and echo
> the results of each command?
amdump -o tapetype=mytapetype
or maybe you mean
amdump -o tapetype:LTO4:blocksize=2048
> Is there some kind o
I tried just blocksize 2043 with the same result.
Is there a way to manually define the tapetype from the command line and echo
the results of each command?
Is there some kind of config command to check a configuration status?
>>> Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/22/2008 3:56 PM >>>
On
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 at 3:06pm, Doyle Collings wrote
I am using a Tandberg Data 1x7 Magnum LTO4 Autoloader. When I use gnutar with a
block size of 2048 (tar -b 4096) I can back up a 2.6 gig iso file in 37
seconds. When I use amanda, the same file takes 4 minutes. I used the following
configure
I am using a Tandberg Data 1x7 Magnum LTO4 Autoloader. When I use gnutar with a
block size of 2048 (tar -b 4096) I can back up a 2.6 gig iso file in 37
seconds. When I use amanda, the same file takes 4 minutes. I used the following
configure line when I compiled my amanda installation.
/downloa
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 3:11 PM, myron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may take a while. I went to the step on setting up the amanda user and
> the niutil command is no longer there.
Read the whole page - there's a fix for that already.
Dustin
--
Storage Software Engineer
http://www.zmanda.co
This may take a while. I went to the step on setting up the amanda
user and the niutil command is no longer there.
I guess I have to think more about this and learn more about my Mac.
--myron
=
Myron Kowalski
MoCoSIN Network/Systems Administrator
Moravian College
Just an FYI for you all, since I didn't see a good place to put it on
the wiki:
Amanada has been working fine for me since 10.5 (now on 10.5.4) using
SSH connections/authentication. I have not tested bsd auth, but the
amanda client itself is fine.
-Darrell
On Jul 22, 2008, at 1:46 PM,
McGraw, Robert P wrote:
When I backup I would like all my larger size files to be put on the first
part of the tape and work down to the smaller size files toward the end of
the tape. This I believe and hope will provide better tape usage.
Yes, it does.
If large size files are dumped last
When I backup I would like all my larger size files to be put on the first
part of the tape and work down to the smaller size files toward the end of
the tape. This I believe and hope will provide better tape usage.
If large size files are dumped last to tape there is a good chance that it
will h
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 1:42 PM, myron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at
> http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Installation/OS_Specific_Notes/Installing_Amanda_on_Mac_OS_X#Version-Specific_Notes
> and it doesn't mention leopard. Do I follow the same instructions?
As far as I know. My machines
I just got a MacBook Pro (10.5.4) and I want to add it as a client on
my Amanda server.
I looked at
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Installation/OS_Specific_Notes/Installing_Amanda_on_Mac_OS_X#Version-Specific_Notes
and it doesn't mention leopard. Do I follow the same instructions?
I noticed
Hi,
No worries - I thought maybe my question was obvious to the point of not
being worthy a reply... :)
Paul Bijns did point out to me that the starttime parameter would be the
one to try, so I will do that. Here's what he said:
The dumpers are not spread in order of the disklist. You cannot
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:37:17AM +0100, Johan Booysen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got no reply so apologies if it was a stupid question. I'm now simply
> using dumporder "Ssss", and Amanda seems to be dumping disklist entries
> starting from largest to smallest, which will work just fine for me.
> I'm d
On 2008-07-22 10:37, Johan Booysen wrote:
Hi,
I got no reply so apologies if it was a stupid question. I'm now simply
using dumporder "Ssss", and Amanda seems to be dumping disklist entries
starting from largest to smallest, which will work just fine for me.
I'm doing level 0 backups each night
Hi,
I got no reply so apologies if it was a stupid question. I'm now simply
using dumporder "Ssss", and Amanda seems to be dumping disklist entries
starting from largest to smallest, which will work just fine for me.
I'm doing level 0 backups each night, and know how long the largest DLE
takes, s
16 matches
Mail list logo
