Good morning.
Thanks to all you patient help, we seem to be very close to getting the new
client working! Thanks.
We mad a bad decision years ago to store all of the Amanda related stuff
in /opt/amanda. This would include the Amado software, configs, and
history. This makes upgrading a bit
Why, given the following arguemnts to configure:
./configure \
--with-config=DailyDump \
--prefix=/opt/amanda \
--with-index-server=amanda.meadwestvaco.com \
--with-tape-server=amanda.meadwestvaco.com \
--with-tape-device=chg-multi \
--with-changer-device=chg-multi \
--with-user=amanda \
OK, we moved foward, only to trip over yet another issue. I got far enough
to try to run a backup set. Looks like that trigered a problem with taper.
amstutus is reporting, in addition to lot's of other normal stuff:
AW0400:/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7 150m failed to tape: runtapes volumes
./configure --help
--with-amlibexecdir[[[=PATH]]]
Where amanda own programs are installed,
default:
$libexecdir/amanda
--without-amlibexecdir Amanda own
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:07 AM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
So, in addition to thanks, I have a question. Since this _is_ the direction
we have chosen to go in, I would like to put the requisite perl modules in
this tree also. Is there a way to get the build process to do this?
Sure thing!
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:23:59AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
./configure --help
--with-amlibexecdir[[[=PATH]]]
Where amanda own programs are installed,
default:
$libexecdir/amanda
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:48 AM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
But, if one is already puting amanda in it's own tree, as we are
(/opt/amanda) then this just adds another (confusing) directory to the path
(EG /opt/amanda/libexec/amanda) `. Is it possible to overide this behavior?
Yep -- see
stan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:23:59AM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
./configure --help
--with-amlibexecdir[[[=PATH]]]
Where amanda own programs are installed,
default:
hi,
we're trying to organise back up logs for our users to interface with and tell
us when they need files restored from tape.
i've created all the listings from the index/ directory, made a copy, gzip -d'd
them to get the filelisting for each entry - but i'm trying to find a way to
figure
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:41 AM, rory_f amanda-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
i know i can `amadmin tor find | grep DLE` to find the amanda tape, and then
compare that to changer-barcodes - but its a bit of a long process
I think that's the quickest way to map amanda labels to paper labels,
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:41 AM, rory_f amanda-forum at
backupcentral.com wrote:
i know i can `amadmin tor find | grep DLE` to find the amanda tape, and
then compare that to changer-barcodes - but its a bit of a long process
I think that's the
Well, the amcheck did complete, after running through 23 tapes.
I have slots 1-23 configured in the config file, just surprised
me that we examined 23 tapes rather than 23 slots. It termined
just fine, dispite going over the 10 loaded tapes 2+ times.
===
Hi guys,
I'll detail the
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:03 AM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
Any thoughts as to what might be going on here?
From the look of it, the taper begins writing a TAPESTART header
(well, two -- one for each child device), then 11s later, fails and
goes looking for a new tape. It finds a new tape,
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:41 AM, rory_f amanda-forum at
backupcentral.com wrote:
i know i can `amadmin tor find | grep DLE` to find the amanda tape, and
then compare that to changer-barcodes - but its a bit of a long process
I think that's the
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:18:37AM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:48 AM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
But, if one is already puting amanda in it's own tree, as we are
(/opt/amanda) then this just adds another (confusing) directory to the path
(EG
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:18:37AM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:48 AM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
But, if one is already puting amanda in it's own tree, as we are
(/opt/amanda) then this just adds another (confusing) directory to the path
(EG
Read previous post and './configure --help' output.
Add --without-amlibexecdir
Jean-Louis
stan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:18:37AM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:48 AM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
But, if one is already puting amanda in it's own
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:34:13PM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:03 AM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
Any thoughts as to what might be going on here?
From the look of it, the taper begins writing a TAPESTART header
(well, two -- one for each child device), then
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:52 PM, rory_f amanda-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
how hard would it be to migrate our naming convention over to match our
labels ? is there any way of doing it?
Well, the Amanda label is written on each tape, at the beginning -- so
you'd need to do some tape-drive
What does
amdevcheck DailyDump rait:{file:/vtapes/DailyDump/vtape5,tape:/dev/nst0}
give you, now that the perl errors are resolved?
Dustin
--
Storage Software Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:52 PM, rory_f amanda-forum at
backupcentral.com wrote:
how hard would it be to migrate our naming convention over to match our
labels ? is there any way of doing it?
Well, the Amanda label is written on each tape, at the
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
I don't expect this to be an issue once I label tapes, but thought
it was odd enough to meantion.
It's doing exactly what you suggest -- looking through the whole
changer to see if it can find a suitable tape.
The
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:34:13PM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:03 AM, stan st...@panix.com wrote:
Any thoughts as to what might be going on here?
From the look of it, the taper begins writing a TAPESTART header
(well, two -- one for each child device), then
rory_f wrote:
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
how hard would it be to migrate our naming convention over to match
our labels ? is there any way of doing it?
If you're talking about changing barcodes to match Amanda's tape label,
couldn't you just replace the barcodes on the tapes with ones
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:52 PM, rory_f amanda-fo...@backupcentral.com
wrote:
how hard would it be to migrate our naming convention over to match our
labels ? is there any way of doing it?
Well, the Amanda label is written on each tape,
Frank Smith wrote:
rory_f wrote:
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
how hard would it be to migrate our naming convention over to match
our labels ? is there any way of doing it?
If you're talking about changing barcodes to match Amanda's tape label,
couldn't you just replace the
rory_f wrote:
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:52 PM, rory_f amanda-forum at
backupcentral.com wrote:
how hard would it be to migrate our naming convention over to match our
labels ? is there any way of doing it?
Well, the Amanda label is written
27 matches
Mail list logo
