Re: taper-parallel-write

2010-11-12 Thread Jack O'Connell
There were no errors reported as shown in the taper log below. There is not enough data to fill one tape in the test disklist I was using but it contain 14 DLEs. I assumed it would use both drives. ts2:/var/log/amanda/server/daily$ cat taper.20101110162643.debug Wed Nov 10 16:26:43 2010:

Re: taper-parallel-write

2010-11-12 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Jack O'Connell wrote: There were no errors reported as shown in the taper log below. There is not enough data to fill one tape in the test disklist I was using but it contain 14 DLEs. I assumed it would use both drives. No, it use only one tape is all the data fit in it. Jean-Louis

planner bumps to level 4 are actually done as level 0's

2010-11-12 Thread Gene Heskett
the BUMPMULT to prevent that I suppose, but wouldn't it make more sense to fix it? I get the impression there is a modulo 4 someplace in the middle. Last night planner set /home to level 4. But In /tmp/amanda-dbug/server/Daily, [r...@coyote Daily]# grep level *.20101112*.debug|grep /home shows

Re: taper-parallel-write

2010-11-12 Thread Jack O'Connell
Is there any way to fool it, or force it to use both drives. I'm not really concerned about filling the tape, but am concerned about improving performance when writing to tape. On Nov 12, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: Jack O'Connell wrote: There were no errors reported

Re: planner bumps to level 4 are actually done as level 0's

2010-11-12 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
. Last night planner set /home to level 4. But In /tmp/amanda-dbug/server/Daily, [r...@coyote Daily]# grep level *.20101112*.debug|grep /home shows the dumplevel as 0 in all returns. And no returns contain planner hits as planner does not say 'level', just the number. Moving to /tmp/amanda-dbg

selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-11-12 Thread jfs10
I have been trying to get this issue resloved all week, and finally decided to ask others. I did searching on the web and tried what I have read, but no success. I am using Amanda 2.5.1. Yes, I know it is old, but it works. Well, it had been working until I moved everything to a different

Re: selfcheck request failed: timeout waiting for ACK

2010-11-12 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
jf...@bnext.stucen.gatech.edu wrote: I have been trying to get this issue resloved all week, and finally decided to ask others. I did searching on the web and tried what I have read, but no success. I am using Amanda 2.5.1. Yes, I know it is old, but it works. Well, it had been working until I