Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

2014-07-02 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 02.07.2014 22:10, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: > Better news, it's already in 3.3.1 > Check for the eject-volume setting. pardon? I have 3.3.5 here already. Looking fwd!

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

2014-07-02 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Better news, it's already in 3.3.1 Check for the eject-volume setting. Jean-Louis On 07/02/2014 03:58 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Am 02.07.2014 21:56, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: Stefan, This feature is already committed for the next major release (3.4). Wow, I love to hear that! I as

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

2014-07-02 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 02.07.2014 21:56, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: > Stefan, > > This feature is already committed for the next major release (3.4). Wow, I love to hear that! I assume you could provide a link to the commit? I'd like to see what you implemented (and maybe comment on that :-) ). Thanks, regards

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

2014-07-02 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
Stefan, This feature is already committed for the next major release (3.4). Jean-Louis On 06/29/2014 05:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: I am currently rewriting my cronjobs to systemd-units and -timers ... and I do that as well for the daily run of amdump. Works fine so far. my question:

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

2014-07-02 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 29.06.2014 23:27, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > > I am currently rewriting my cronjobs to systemd-units and -timers ... > and I do that as well for the daily run of amdump. > > Works fine so far. > > my question: > > It is rather easy to do a "mt -f /dev/st0 offl" after a successful > amdu