Hi,

Below tape performance from running similar workload in version 3.2.0 and 
recently upgraded version 3.3.7p1. In this run I'm doing  tape to tape 
vaulting. As you can see a huge degraded writing performance. I'm running the 
backup on Solaris 10 on sparc.  Xfer IO seems to be much slower than in 
previous version for some reason ?
Any ideas how to proceed and find out what's going on ?

Thanks Gunnar Gunnarsson


3.2.0

Tape Time (hrs:min)         3:02       3:02       0:00
Tape Size (meg)         747221.3   747221.3        0.0
Tape Used (%)              170.2      170.2        0.0
DLEs Taped                    16         16          0
Parts Taped                   29         29          0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  70005.0    70005.0        --

USAGE BY TAPE:
  Label               Time         Size      %  DLEs Parts
  Orabck-Unix-194     1:49      440059M   94.4    12    18
  Orabck-Unix-195     1:11      307162M   65.9     4    11

3.3.7p1

Tape Time (hrs:min)         4:54       4:54       0:00
Tape Size (meg)         598327.5   598327.5        0.0
Tape Used (%)              135.9      135.9        0.0
DLEs Taped                    11         11          0
Parts Taped                   23         23          0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s)  34738.8    34738.8        --

USAGE BY TAPE:
  Label                 Time         Size      %  DLEs Parts
  Orabck-Unix-196       3:19      410261M   88.0     7    15
  Orabck-Unix-197       1:32      188066M   40.4     4     8


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] För 
Gunnarsson, Gunnar
Skickat: den 3 september 2015 22:11
Till: Jean-Francois Malouin; amanda-users@amanda.org
Ämne: SV: Tape write rate much slower efter upgrade


I'm doing amvault from disk to tape the workload on the server is the same no 
shortage of memory cpu resources.
Xfer rate to tape reduced by 60% from version 3.2.0 to 3.3.7 !

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] För 
Jean-Francois Malouin
Skickat: den 3 september 2015 21:37
Till: amanda-users@amanda.org
Ämne: Re: Tape write rate much slower efter upgrade

Hi, 


* Jean-Louis Martineau <martin...@zmanda.com> [20150903 15:21]:
> Gunnar,
> 
> Do the number by DLE always differ?
> Are you using a holding disk?
> Can you monitor the server to find some bottleneck, memory, cpu, 
> network, disk I/O, ...

I witnessed the same behaviour back in February when upgrading from
3.3.5 to 3.3.7. I tried to post to the list a few times but somehow my posts 
never made it, maybe because they had 2 pics attached showing the performance 
from the hold disk to the tape drive. Here's what I wrote back then:

"2 weeks ago I upgraded one of my amanda server from 3.3.5 to 3.3.7.
Right away I noticed a ~25% tape write performance degradation to a LTO4 tape 
drive. I've attached 2 pics showing the xfer IO rate to/from the
holddisk: one shows a snapshot of the week after the upgrade with the 10th of 
Feb still at 3.3.5 (and a xfer rate of ~100MBs) and a drop to ~75MBs after the 
upgrade was done.  I reverted back to 3.3.5 a few days ago and the 2nd snapshot 
shows a return to previous rate."

HTH,
jf

> 
> Jean-Louis
> 
> On 03/09/15 02:49 PM, Gunnarsson, Gunnar wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >See below slow down in avg tp write rate after having upgraded amanda 
> >from 3.2.0 to 3.3.7p1 nothing else is changed.
> >
> >We are using DLT drivers SCSI and fiber connected.
> >
> >Thanks Gunnar
> >
> >Tape Time (hrs:min) 2:37       2:37       0:00
> >
> >Tape Size (meg) 382968.9   382968.9        0.0
> >
> >Tape Used (%) 324.1      324.1        0.0
> >
> >DLEs Taped 462        462          0
> >
> >Parts Taped 462        462          0
> >
> >Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 41670.4    41670.4        --
> >
> >(brought to you by Amanda version 3.2.0)
> >
> >Tape Time (hrs:min) 4:18       4:18       0:00
> >
> >Tape Size (meg) 384525.8   384525.8        0.0
> >
> >Tape Used (%) 334.0      334.0        0.0
> >
> >DLEs Taped 481        481          0
> >
> >Parts Taped 481        481          0
> >
> >Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 25469.2    25469.2        --
> >
> >(brought to you by Amanda version 3.3.7p1)
> >
> >Tape Time (hrs:min) 6:03       1:46       4:18
> >
> >Tape Size (meg) 710405.4   208727.0   501678.5
> >
> >Tape Used (%) 161.0       47.4      113.6
> >
> >DLEs Taped 12          4          8  1:7 2:1
> >
> >Parts Taped 27          8         19  1:11 2:8
> >
> >Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 33357.3    33701.7    33216.0
> >
> >USAGE BY TAPE:
> >
> >  Label Time         Size      %  DLEs Parts
> >
> >  Orabck-Unix-002 3:37      431135M   92.5    11    19
> >
> >  Orabck-Unix-003 2:25      279270M   59.9     1     8
> >
> >(brought to you by Amanda version 3.3.7p1)
> >
> >Tape Time (hrs:min) 3:13       0:11       3:01
> >
> >Tape Size (meg) 776730.9    50668.0   726062.8
> >
> >Tape Used (%) 177.9       12.6      165.3
> >
> >DLEs Taped 18          4         14  1:9 2:5
> >
> >Parts Taped 33          4         29  1:11 2:18
> >
> >Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 68857.4    77438.9    68329.0
> >
> >USAGE BY TAPE:
> >
> >  Label Time         Size      %  DLEs Parts
> >
> >  Orabck-Unix-015     1:34 392152M   84.2     4    12
> >
> >  Orabck-Unix-016     1:34 384579M   82.5    14    21
> >
> >(brought to you by Amanda version 3.2.0)
> >
> 


Reply via email to