Re: archive and near-line usage

On 18/11/15 11:35 AM, David Simpson wrote: Hi Deb, Jon Hopefully this will cover both responses. Thanks again... Holdingdisk is already configured as 2000GB that as much as I can do on that server. Chunksize I have already set to 500MB Advice on 1/4 of tape size for max DE noted. Archive

RE: archive and near-line usage

Hi Deb, Jon Hopefully this will cover both responses. Thanks again... Holdingdisk is already configured as 2000GB that as much as I can do on that server. Chunksize I have already set to 500MB Advice on 1/4 of tape size for max DE noted. >>Archive - with infinite tapes: Amanda will chug

Re: archive and near-line usage

Jon, thanks for the whole overview. THAT’s what was needed!! > On Nov 18, 2015, at 10:35 AM, David Simpson > wrote: > > An important point. Perhaps it would be prudent to change to this (?) to > reduce the nightly volume: > > dumpcycle 2 weeks > runspercycle

Re: archive and near-line usage

On 18/11/15 06:00, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:27:30PM +, Debra S Baddorf wrote: AMANDA USERS LIST: anybody else want to jump in here with better ideas?? I’m open to better suggestions ….. I’m probably making a real hash of this, and not necessarily making

Re: archive and near-line usage

On 18/11/15 05:54 AM, Chris Lee wrote: Hi All, As I read this thread and think of the many others I have seen with people talking of multiple configs in order to make things work I think maybe there is scope for a feature request for an enhanced holding disk config: A holding disk system