Re: working with storage definitions

2017-09-01 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On 01/09/17 03:16 PM, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: hmm. That is kind of a problem. I should have more than sufficient space now, but the allocation of where it goes could overflow if the planning is blind to the storage allocations. Maybe that is something to be developed? As I already wrote, It is

Re: working with storage definitions

2017-09-01 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
hmm. That is kind of a problem. I should have more than sufficient space now, but the allocation of where it goes could overflow if the planning is blind to the storage allocations. Maybe that is something to be developed? As to where to report the storage use, the Amanda report doesn't have

Re: working with storage definitions

2017-09-01 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On 01/09/17 02:10 PM, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: OK. So, how does the planner plan for what goes on each storage? It doesn't, it use the size and plan to dump less than that. That is, if I set up a pseudo tapetype for global and give it a length of, say, 12.5TB; how will it know that the

Re: working with storage definitions

2017-09-01 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
OK. So, how does the planner plan for what goes on each storage? That is, if I set up a pseudo tapetype for global and give it a length of, say, 12.5TB; how will it know that the uncompressed DLEs are targeted to the LTO7 and the compressed DLEs are targeted at the LTO6? What if the