Re: following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Gene Heskett
>>>> So, if you want to do the deep dive to try to debug that quirk... > >>>> the next step will be to look through the > >>>> /var/log/amanda/Daily/amdump.20181112* > >>>> log file (assuming the run in question started afte

Re: following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Debra S Baddorf
at quirk... >>>> the next step will be to look through the >>>> /var/log/amanda/Daily/amdump.20181112* >>>> log file (assuming the run in question started after midnight this >>>> morning; if not the datetime-stamp would be 2018* of course). >>> >&

Re: following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 12 November 2018 15:44:04 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 15:18:05 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > So, if you want to do the deep dive to try to debug that quirk... > > > the next step will be to look through the > > > /var/lo

Re: following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 16:29:45 -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 03:44:04PM -0500, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > > (Look at the top of the output of "amadmin Daily status"; the very first > > line should be > > Using: [PATH...]/amdump.1 > > , where [PATH...] is the path

Re: following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Jon LaBadie
/var/log/amanda/Daily/amdump.20181112* > > > log file (assuming the run in question started after midnight this > > > morning; if not the datetime-stamp would be 2018* of course). > > > > It did, I have some other stuff so it isn't started till about 03:05. > >

Re: following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 15:18:05 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > > So, if you want to do the deep dive to try to debug that quirk... the > > next step will be to look through the > > /var/log/amanda/Daily/amdump.20181112* > > log file (assuming the run in questio

Re: following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Gene Heskett
it would plann to do if it > ends up deciding to do an incremental for that DLE. > > However, off hand I would have expected colyote:/var to be mentioned > in the "promoted from N days ahead" lines, but it's not there (and all > 21 promoted DLEs are listed, so it seems some

Re: All level 0 on the same run?

2018-11-12 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 13:56:33 -0500, Chris Nighswonger wrote: > backup@scriptor:~ amadmin campus info host dev > > Current info for host dev: > Stats: dump rates (kps), Full: 6015.9, 5898.2, 5771.4 > Incremental: 1658.2, 1456.6, 343.4 > compressed size, Full:

Balance after DLE splitting

2018-11-12 Thread Chris Nighswonger
Was "All level 0 on the same run?" The old thread was getting a bit stranded... On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 11:39:58 -0500, Chris Nighswonger wrote: > > I think that is output from one of Gene's systems, but here is the latest > >

Re: All level 0 on the same run?

2018-11-12 Thread Chris Nighswonger
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 1:50 PM Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 13:28:15 -0500, Chris Nighswonger wrote: > > I found the long overdue culprit... It was a windows client using the ZWC > > community client. The ZWC service had hung (not an uncommon problem) and > > Amanda

Re: All level 0 on the same run?

2018-11-12 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 13:28:15 -0500, Chris Nighswonger wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nathan Stratton Treadway > wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 11:39:58 -0500, Chris Nighswonger wrote: > > > (3 filesystems overdue. The most being overdue 17841 days.) > > > > > > Not sure

Re: All level 0 on the same run?

2018-11-12 Thread Chris Nighswonger
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 5:03 PM Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 11:39:58 -0500, Chris Nighswonger wrote: > > (3 filesystems overdue. The most being overdue 17841 days.) > > > > Not sure what's up with the overdues. There were none prior to breaking > up > > the DLEs.

Re: following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
that DLE. However, off hand I would have expected colyote:/var to be mentioned in the "promoted from N days ahead" lines, but it's not there (and all 21 promoted DLEs are listed, so it seems something else is up). So, if you want to do the deep dive to try to debug that quirk... the next

Re: following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 06:40:56AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > amanda@coyote:/root$ /usr/local/sbin/amadmin Daily balance > > due-date #fsorig MB out MB balance > -- > 11/12 Mon1 32963 7875-53.6% > 11/13 Tue1

following the "balance" report

2018-11-12 Thread Gene Heskett
amanda@coyote:/root$ /usr/local/sbin/amadmin Daily balance due-date #fsorig MB out MB balance -- 11/12 Mon1 32963 7875-53.6% 11/13 Tue1 7688 7688-54.7% 11/14 Wed2 22109 22109+30.3%