Re: Mail w/ amverify

2001-06-26 Thread Arjan Molenaar
"John R. Jackson" wrote: > > >... I hacked the script a bit to send mail *or* send to stdout (by > >means of a -m switch, the same way amcheck does). > > That's probably a good idea. > > Could you post the change again but use a context (-c) or unified > (-u) diff? Plain diff cannot be applied

Re: Mail w/ amverify

2001-06-25 Thread Arjan Molenaar
"John R. Jackson" wrote: > > >... I hacked the script a bit to send mail *or* send to stdout (by > >means of a -m switch, the same way amcheck does). > > That's probably a good idea. > > Could you post the change again but use a context (-c) or unified > (-u) diff? Plain diff cannot be applied

Re: tcp port

2001-06-22 Thread Arjan Molenaar
"John R. Jackson" wrote: > > >... I've done that, but amrecover wants a portnumber < 1024... You can > >off course hack the sources ;-) > > As far as I know, only the 2.5 (development) code branch has this problem > with amrecover. Have you seen it with 2.4.2p2? > I'm using the 2.4.2p2tapeio b

Mail w/ amverify

2001-06-22 Thread Arjan Molenaar
I noticed that the amverify script sends both output by mail and via stdout. I hacked the script a bit to send mail *or* send to stdout (by means of a -m switch, the same way amcheck does). Here's the patch. Regards, Arjan 25a26,34 > # First determine if we should run in mail mode: nothing is

Re: Looking for a little help

2001-06-22 Thread Arjan Molenaar
Kevin C Jones wrote: > > I have installed amanda onto a Redhat 6.2 box. > Everything went into okay, I edited the amanda.conf and made a dumptype and > disklist. OK. > When I run the amcheck Daily comment... I get the following error: > > /usr/local/sbin/amcheck Daily > Amanda Tape Server Host

Re: tcp port

2001-06-19 Thread Arjan Molenaar
Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2001, "Wong Ching Kuen Frederick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > for udp port, i could use <1024 > > for tcp port, i should use ports > 1024. > > is this correct? > > Yep. No, I've done that, but amrecover wants a portnumber < 1024... You can off course

Re: Amrecover problems

2001-06-13 Thread Arjan Molenaar
Hi, Amrecover wants a reserved port (<=1024) for itself. Seems like you have to rebuild it ;-). (Dunno *why*, but it does...) Regards, Arjan Nate Burton wrote: > > I was able to run amdump and it appears that everything ran and backed up > correctly, based on the logs and the Amanda report.

portrange >1024???

2001-06-08 Thread Arjan Molenaar
Hi, I'm new to the list and am have a question... Why is it that Amanda wants reserved ports (<=1024) for backup and recovery. It clearly has something to do with security, but I do not see the point of not using higher ports. I am not very well educated in IP theory, but maybe someone could shi

Amanda-242-tapeio and IRIX

2001-04-23 Thread Arjan Molenaar
Hi, I'm Arjan Molenaar, a Dutch sysadmin and currently implementing a backup scheme based on Amanda. This morging I checked out the Tapeio branch of Amanda. I noted that it did not compile due to a typo in tape-src/tape-output.c. Browsing the mailing list archive I came across a patch